PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - ADS-B mandate – huge misallocation of resources
Old 9th Apr 2018, 09:00
  #17 (permalink)  
BlockNotAvailable
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: YXXX
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr Approach
My ex-colleagues tell me that things have moved on - ADS-B is good for 3NM separation. They also tell me that it feeds the radar plot along with the other sensors so controllers don't know the system is using it. If the SSR coverage runs out the they will see an ADS-B symbol (Apparently the system will display an SSR symbol before an ADS-B symbol when both are being received). I also got the impression that the ATCs cannot select what they are looking at so would have been unable to do the check of ADS-B as Dick wanted.
Not quite, it does favour SSR over ADSB in the display. But there is an indication that shows if it is receiving ADSB or not as well.

EDIT: Not sure about the 3nm. It's not in the docs up here. IANAE but I do agree the ADSB would be more accurate than a rotating head.
BlockNotAvailable is offline