PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - MATZ penetration and communication with a military airfield
Old 7th Apr 2018, 08:40
  #89 (permalink)  
this is my username
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jan Olieslagers
@chevvron: I cannot imagine any other nation than the Brits recommending avoidance of (bits of) G airspace. It cannot get more ridiculous unless class H is introduced. Surely class G means "no guidance whatsoever, all are up to themselves and good luck to them"?
The problem is that if everyone ignores the MATZ and this becomes an issue for the military then there is an easy solution - just replace the MATZ with controlled airspace. I don't think we'd want that to happen.
this is my username is offline