PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Surely LNAV+V must be safer?
Thread: Surely LNAV+V must be safer?
View Single Post
Old 5th Apr 2018, 08:17
  #2 (permalink)  
ftrplt
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 431
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
however the people at CASA appear to make out that LNAV+V does not improve safety over the existing RNAV, and it is really required to be Baro-VNAV
where is the evidence for this claim?

In that case, isn’t it clear that LNAV+V provides a safety advantage over basic RNAV?
It is very clear. Where has it been claimed this is not the case?
ftrplt is offline  
Reply