Never let the facts get in the way of a good rant!
VAG277,
Who was it said:
"History is written by the victors".
In this case the relevant union, in creating a few more jobs in a rather pleasant seaside resort town, with nil contribution to safety outcomes.
All at huge expense to those paying for this economic waste, the statistics are unassailable.
That is the "true facts", as I have stated, the CASA record omits the most important information, a positive benefit/cost cost justification for RFFS, because there isn't one.
The outcome at RFFS at Ballina is EXACTLY as predicted at the meeting, to which I referred.
Some of the handstands CASA (and its predecessors) have done, over the years, to avoid genuine risk delineation, let alone competent benefit/cost assessment, have been quite spectacular in their audacity.
Tootle pip!!
PS: Folks, have a look at the RFFS "policy paper" outcomes, it really does fit Lead Balloons "self licking ice cream".