PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Why did US fighters not use cannon in WW2?
Old 5th Mar 2018, 19:14
  #70 (permalink)  
Bing
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 343
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by KenV
All those different wings cannot be good for mass production, nor for logistics/maintenance. And that was one big reason why the US pretty much standardized on machine gun armament. It greatly simplified production as well as logistics.
It's not as bad as it sounds, by late '41 early '42 the Spitfire Vc was introduced with the universal wing that could carry any of those combination of weapons. Bear in mind there were other modifications being made to the wing as the aircraft evolved to strengthen it and ease production so it's not as if a wing from a Mk1 would have worked on a Mk9 anyway.

http://spitfiresite.com/2010/04/conc...g-types.html/2
Bing is offline