9APlus:
Sorry, but you should use "google translate" if you are not able to communicate in english-but then, if you cannot pass ELP4, you might need more than "just" a helicopter ATO..
You are getting confused about a lot of things here:
If you had a training contract with Heli Aviation-that is between you and Heli Aviation (and your lawyer, if needed)...
This has nothing to do with Babcock....although they might have bought your contract with Heli Aviation-that is up to the lawyers and the court to decide.....
Nothing of interest to the community here....
The issue between the LBA and Heli Aviation (now Babcock MCS Germany) are a complete different subject-and your usage of the words "LBA" and "EASA" shows that you fail to understand how the authorities and responsibilities are divided these days...
EASA has nothing to do with Heli Aviation......
The ATO and/or AOC is under the responsibility of the LBA-the German CAA.
They are a member of EASA-and act accordingly.
EASA (who have their HQ in Germany/cologne-but that is just coincidence in that case) do not get involved directly with an ATO....this is the responsibility of the LBA...
So i would recommend you either say what you have to say.....or leave it like that...