ZFT - we are in agreement -
[QUOTE=misd-agin;10055151]Some really bad information here. 5 dog nose down might not break the stall. And waiting for x airspeed to pull?How hard are you going to pull? How heavy are you? How high are you? Or does any of that aerodynamics and physics stuff matter?
Simulators don’t have post stall AOA fidelity. That’s the change. A and B have agreed to a generic n/b post stall fidelity model.
You can’t compare current, or especially older, ‘stalls’ in a simulator and pretend they’re the real thing. They’re not.
/QUOTE]
I’m not sure I understand what you are stating here.0
As of now (most) regulations only require datapacks with stall models up to onset of initial buffet or thereabouts.
On March 30, 2016, the FAA published changes to the 14 CFR Part 60 Qualification Performance Standards (QPS) that define updated general, subjective, and objective testing requirements for high angle of attack modeling and the qualification of full stall maneuvers on Level C and Level D FSTDs.
EASA published NPA 2017-13 addressing many changes including advance stall.
Some of the founding members of AUPTRA have conveniently merged UPRT with advanced stall to produce ridiculously high cost aero model add ons for FSTDs
Most changes will be in regulations from 2019?