I assume you are inferring that I've deliberately left out the LHR and LGW figures because they would reflect badly on SEN - yes? If so pull those horns in P.S and your tongue while you're at it.
LHR was 80.7% and LGW 71.1% and the only reason I didn't include them is that most discussions on here involve SEN's relationship with LTN, STN and LCY. To have included LHR and LGW initially would make SEN look even better.