Originally Posted by
Dick Smith
Car. You completely misunderstand what I am saying.
My view has always been the opposite to what you are implying.
It is the CASA act that states the myth that safety is the most important consideration.
Why not get the act to reflect what happens in practice. I would support that.
Ok let's use your regional air service point. You reckon CASA are putting cost ahead of safety by allowing "lesser" aircraft to service them. So what do you expect if safety was put first; tiny towns to upgrade runways to take CAT D/E 4 engine aircraft with level 10 RFFS and ATC and CATIII ILSs to each runway?