SPECIOUS ARGUMENTS.
('MY WORD' Is a word game, played by people whose business is words.)
In what circumstances can CASA say that saving the costs of mitigating a risk to the safety of air navigation is more important that mitigating the risk?
Did someone just say "dill" ? (whose self-editing is far from flawless.)
Why do the drafters of all these rules and regs use such appalling
terms as "appetite", presumably trying to colour the terminology as to whether or not the regulator is hungry for getting "the matrix" just right, on his plate.
But all that, and all that, is merely muttering in the wings.