I think the problem (for Maurice) is that he's in prison for breaching a restraining order - but keeps arguing his innocence using irrelevant (old) arguments (machine guns, mental illness etc.).
Whilst his arguments in these other cases might, or might not, be valid they are definitely not relevant for this particular case:
1. He was issued a restraining order.
2. He breached the restraining order.
All pretty simple really, unfortunately. The reasons behind the restraining order are ancient history until his appeals for them are heard there.
It's not going to happen, but is it possible he'd still be guilty of breaching the restraining order even if the case that created it was thrown out on appeal? Any lawyers out there?