If this comes at a cost (which it would) then that segment of the industry that requires it may well have to pay.
Yep. That's Dick Smith. And LB.
No Bloggs. It would be your employer. That’s why Dick’s idea of E around some non-towered airports hasn’t been implemented.
If you think the cost of ‘the system’ to us LCDs was and remains a relevant consideration in the construction of ‘the system’, you haven’t been paying much attention to the results of a couple of decades of regulatory ‘reform’.
While ever heavy metal pilots fulminate about the limitations of un-alerted see and avoid on the one hand, yet fly around in the class of airspace that maximises the chances of reliance on un-alerted see and avoid on the other, this will continue.
In your case, you go so far as saying that Australian G is better than Australian E. I note that I haven’t seen a groundswell of support for your position from your colleagues.