By REMAX11 - I checked and found most of Bondi posts informative and accurate. I do believe that pilots nowadays are too naive about the working practices of their employers and really do not understand or choose to ignore the consequences and implications.
Thanks REMAX11. You are correct, many agency employed pilots fail to understand the erosion of their rights permitted by atypical employment schemes.
INKJET again makes inventive claims in an attempt to crush any post perceived as being negative on Norwegian, this time by suggesting those providing such information are not competent to command jet transport aircraft. The suggestion is indicative of a cult member intoxicated by the euphoria of a hypnotic guru leader. Tambourines, Kool-Aid and aeroplanes may provide a dangerous mix.
INKJET and his cronies should check their purported facts at the Fornebu rats nest before posting. When checking, please update me on the DY7006 report. The blunder and debacle detailed in the report is indeed a prime example of the selective and wrongful “removal mechanisms” permitted by atypical employment schemes. The leader of Parat union is quoted in Dagbladet as saying the actions against the cabin crew “Reeks of punishment and discrimination” – Links:
https://www.dagbladet.no/nyheter/kab...einen/60837192
https://www.dagbladet.no/nyheter/ras...dling/60720657
Good luck and be sure to carefully read the agency contract, particularly clause 10.b or similar - consider review by an employment lawyer.