Originally Posted by
EAP86
I don't want to be appearing to obsess about Mark Sedwill but by coincidence the following appeared in the latest Private Eye and it is relevant to this topic:
EAP
Thank you for posting that Private Eye post. It would certainly appear that interesting things are afoot. The Eye back Sedwill to get support for his perception of risk from cyber and terror, over the risk from conventional warfare. If that is the case, why the Hell are we building and paying for the carriers? I personally feel that there is a growing need for protection from cyber and terror, but not to the detriment of our IND or our conventional forces, apart from... the carriers!
OAP