PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Times details proposed UK defence cut options
Old 15th Jan 2018, 17:20
  #83 (permalink)  
floating_rock
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the above 15 or so posts illustrate so much of what is wrong with our RW aviation setup - the tri-service bickering does zip all for any of us, and inhibits us at every step.

How about going radical - post everyone, under whatever guise to JHC, allowing freedom of movement between fleets as required - with a natural bias of people to their home service. We already have significant numbers of AAC backfilling Puma, FAA backfilling AH, and RAF backfilling AAC and FAA QHI slots.

This would allow a more flexible manning structure, fitting in with ever changing manning priorities. (The incoming exodus from AAC when the last FRI time bar runs out in 2 years, for example).

Additionally, massive savings could be made by rationalising the number of headquarters, rather than triplicating many roles in what is now a small community.

If we hadn't had tri-service bickering, then Blackhawk & Seahawk may well have been a single platform solution to many of Wildcat \ Puma \ green Merlin's roles (UK company procurement aims aside), saving God knows how much in procurement, training, and giving us sensible economies of scale, rather than having a large number of small fleets.
floating_rock is offline