Originally Posted by
megan
Bend alot,The type certificate, to repeat, does require. So the snooker table is all good.
The flight manual system for Australia was not based on the type certificate requirements. The Australian Flight Manual as such was a document uniquely Australian, and yes in its great and lofty self DCA produced its own document, later requiring the industry to produce it. (It is all caught up in the perceived unsuitability of the POH as a legal document) This was the document specified under 20.7.4. It wasn't much of a document, and its main purpose seemed to be to hold the (once again) unique Australian performance charts. This was only for part 23 aircraft and some odd balls (like the Bristol 170). For part 25 aircraft, the flight manual from the original certificating Authority was fine. It did end up with Australian supplements in it (like when some chaps went off and terrified themselves by redoing the Lear 24 landing performance) I cannot find any reference to a revised POH or flight manual for the DHC-2 float installation STC. The performance information for the floatplane has to be somewhere.