All the stuff you require is to prevent change. Or do you have a vested interest in all these invented safety studies?
And are you suggesting people like Angus Houston and the Secretary of DOT were part of “crash through studies”. You are wrong .
And I am delighted you bring up Voices of Reason . Clearly some group with a vested interest in making huge money out of such humbug. If in doubt always follow self interest and the money trail.
If VOR has a genuine interest in public safety they would clearly operate publicly.
What a con!
You are clearly anglingg for huge amounts of money to be paid for all these Australian unique studies. It won’t work
You've drawn a long bow from my post #624.
I was merely quoting what had been said in earlier threads (para 5 in the second link), and the safety assessment and change management process outlined in my last sentence is what has been required by CASA OAR for quite some time and detailed in their various documents here:
https://www.casa.gov.au/airspace/sta...change-process