737 QRH Cab Alt Warn and Emergency Des
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2013
Location: London
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
737 QRH Cab Alt Warn and Emergency Des
Hi 737 Experts,
I'm trying to trace back the reason why the 14,000' criteria was removed from the Cabin Altitude Warning memory items and Emergency Descent condition statement.
I hoped to go back over the old revisions but just discovered that they are not available on our document management system.
Anybody got any ideas?
I'm trying to trace back the reason why the 14,000' criteria was removed from the Cabin Altitude Warning memory items and Emergency Descent condition statement.
I hoped to go back over the old revisions but just discovered that they are not available on our document management system.
Anybody got any ideas?
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
737 QRH Cab Alt Warn and Emergency Des
Not sure what the official reason is but I'd say it would go something like..."it's the wrong time to try and figure out if the cabin is going to reach 14,000' and pilots aren't that smart anyway (I'm one) so just put the pax oxygen on and be done with it".
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hang on, let me check the FMS...
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It may have been to standadise the procedure with other Boeing types.
A few normal & non-normal procedures have been tweaked to bring them in line with more recent boeing types such as the 777.
However don't know 100% if this particular procedure was changed because of the above.
A few normal & non-normal procedures have been tweaked to bring them in line with more recent boeing types such as the 777.
However don't know 100% if this particular procedure was changed because of the above.
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: here and there
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pass oxy on
I'm very happy with the change, it says if cabin altitude uncontrollable after manual mode of the controller and there's not much between 10,000 &14,000 when cabins uncontrollable.
The other checklist that's changed for the better is the airspeed unreliable and that's great.
The other checklist that's changed for the better is the airspeed unreliable and that's great.
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Keyboard
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting, if it's not for the sake of simplicity Im curious what incidents are hidden behind that.
Would be helpful if anyone who has a copy of a previous revision to post the exact wording here.
Looking again at the Rev Changes it must be done "for cross model standardisation"
Would be helpful if anyone who has a copy of a previous revision to post the exact wording here.
Looking again at the Rev Changes it must be done "for cross model standardisation"
Last edited by Qwerti; 6th Feb 2015 at 18:46.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
737 QRH Cab Alt Warn and Emergency Des
Now you have to drop them even when able to level off <14000ft, but I guess that's an acceptable tradeoff between standardisation and change of occurance.
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Fl410
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Old wording in condition statement
Condition: One or more of these occur:
* Cabin altitude cannot be controlled when the airplane is above 14.000 feet
* A rapid descent is needed.
* Cabin altitude cannot be controlled when the airplane is above 14.000 feet
* A rapid descent is needed.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2013
Location: London
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi,
Thanks for the replies.
Take the old sim scenario where the TRE creates a pressurisation problem after takeoff, hoping you don't notice, so that as you climb through 10,000 you get the cabin alt warning.
Conventional wisdom was that you would don your masks (although some didn't bother), stop the climb and request a descent to 9 or 10,000 feet. Now, because the 14,000' criteria has been specifically removed, that option is not available without extensive justification. The only course of action now is to don your masks, do the cab alt warm mems and a rapid descent to 10,000.
Of course, you can choose how to manage this, but now any deviation results in that tedious justification of not following the meme. Rapid descent in the terminal area? Hmmm.
Thanks for the replies.
Take the old sim scenario where the TRE creates a pressurisation problem after takeoff, hoping you don't notice, so that as you climb through 10,000 you get the cabin alt warning.
Conventional wisdom was that you would don your masks (although some didn't bother), stop the climb and request a descent to 9 or 10,000 feet. Now, because the 14,000' criteria has been specifically removed, that option is not available without extensive justification. The only course of action now is to don your masks, do the cab alt warm mems and a rapid descent to 10,000.
Of course, you can choose how to manage this, but now any deviation results in that tedious justification of not following the meme. Rapid descent in the terminal area? Hmmm.
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Home soon
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Whenever a cabin altitude warning occurs or is expected to occur,o2 masks should defintively be worn.
In the scenario of a cabin alt occurs passing 10000 ft,masks would come on , a good look at the bleeds position and MSA while going through the cab alt NNC.
Obviously if your MSA is higher than 10000 ,good idea to continue the climb rather than starting an emergency descent.
Correct briefing, situational awarness,NNC knowledge tend to avoid unnecessary embarassement if not major **** ups.
In the scenario of a cabin alt occurs passing 10000 ft,masks would come on , a good look at the bleeds position and MSA while going through the cab alt NNC.
Obviously if your MSA is higher than 10000 ,good idea to continue the climb rather than starting an emergency descent.
Correct briefing, situational awarness,NNC knowledge tend to avoid unnecessary embarassement if not major **** ups.
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: IRS NAV ONLY
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Of course, you can choose how to manage this, but now any deviation results in that tedious justification of not following the meme. Rapid descent in the terminal area? Hmmm.