Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

ACT Airbus 321

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

ACT Airbus 321

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Apr 2010, 07:53
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: where the plane is parked
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ACT Airbus 321

Gents,

anyone heard about an A321 with ACT's like on an A319 ACJ?
The ACJ boosts it's range with 6 additional tanks. Is there a 321 option -most likely also for a VIP/private 321 version- to get 6 ACT's on top of the standart fuel config?

Cheers
deep flyer is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2010, 08:58
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Europe
Age: 45
Posts: 625
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is indeed an option; Finnair have ACTs installed in their A321 enabling them to go direct Finland - Canaries with a full load of punters, but I don't know how many they've installed.
SMT Member is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2010, 09:17
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stockholm Sweden
Age: 74
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not only ACJ, but all A319/20/21 have an ACT option.
The Qatar Airways A319LR have provision for six tanks, but operate with only one fitted.
The charter operators in Sweden have them on their A321s as well.
There is now a new option for the A318 as well. It is different because the A318 cargo doors are smaller.
BA was talking about fitting an ACT in their A318s this summer, but haven't heard anything lately?
Swedish Steve is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2010, 10:52
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: where the plane is parked
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good point on Finnair. However my special interest is on the combination 321 AND 6 ACT's. CG problems? Structural problems? Any 321 flying around in this configuration?
deep flyer is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2010, 11:33
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Madrid
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The A 321s operated in my company are equiped with just two additional ACT that increase the maximum fuel load 4786Kg.
Depending on how much fuel is loaded in these tanks, the cargo to be loaded in the H3,H4 and Bulk compartments might be limited.
alatriste is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2010, 11:38
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Toulouse
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ACT Airbus A321

Airbus does offer the A321 with either one or two Additional Centre Tanks (ACTs) in the cargo hold to add some range.

The structure does need to be reinforced to carry ACTs, however, and of course the fuel system needs to be adapted to accommodate them.

Only the A318 Elite (2 ACTs) , Airbus ACJ (up to 6 ACTs) and A320 Prestige (1 or 2 ACTs) are actively offered by Airbus as corporate jets today (they appear to satisfy most needs).

If a customer really wanted to have an A321 with 2 ACTs, then it should be possible.
Dave Does It is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2010, 11:40
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: France
Age: 56
Posts: 60
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As far as I am aware, the A321 is only certified for up to 2 ACTs. This limit is understood to not necessarily be because there are any physical constraints to having further ACTs, but more likely because there has not been the demand or identified market for such additional design.

Dave Does It just beat me to the same answer!
Big Bad D is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2010, 19:14
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: where the plane is parked
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok, considering a 23.000kg standart fuel capacity plus 2 ACT's -each 2450kgs- gives a maximum of 28.000kg. Correct?
deep flyer is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2010, 07:56
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stockholm Sweden
Age: 74
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok, considering a 23.000kg standart fuel capacity
No. The standard fuel capacity of all the narrow body airbuses is around 19000kg.
Swedish Steve is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2010, 08:24
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Steve is right. We have a mixture of A321s and 320s with none, one or two ACTs. And I never can remember which is which
Nubboy is offline  
Old 1st May 2010, 09:56
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Speaking about ACTs...

Got contacted recently by a colleague for a finding of a yellowish, glue type substance in the drain system of the space between the bladder and the "box", in the angled tube that is just underneath the ACT of an A320.

Heard a voice that said it may be a small leak from the bladder, and that fuel dissolves Dinitrol in the box, and this mixture then eventually clogs up the drain line (talking about small leaks!).

I have checked the A340 ACT CMM, and there is no reference to Dinitrol.

Any thoughts? Any experience?

Regards, J.V.
jettison valve is offline  
Old 1st May 2010, 11:27
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: EGGW
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did you search for the word Dinitrol or Airbus term TPS in the CMM?
Mr @ Spotty M is offline  
Old 1st May 2010, 14:02
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mr @ Spotty M,

I searched for "Dinitrol", the AI CML number for Dinitrol ("05-something", if I remember correctly), and browsed through the cleaning and assembly sections of the CMM. The only "chemicals" to be applied were 16-001 and 16-002 (again: If I remember correctly... worn out brain...), and those are paints.

No traces of Dinitrol in and around the ACT... At least in the paperwork...

Clueless regards, J. V.
jettison valve is offline  
Old 1st May 2010, 14:19
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hundred Acre Wood
Posts: 264
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For info, all the British Midland A321s have one ACT. Most of these are the ex-British Mediterranean aircraft and without the extra tank Tehran to London non-stop would not be possible.
Doug E Style is offline  
Old 2nd May 2010, 02:34
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: London,England
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
And sometimes still isn't. We have the wrong aircraft for the job on that route.
Max Angle is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.