Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

Boeing: 787 will fly before year's end now

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Boeing: 787 will fly before year's end now

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Aug 2009, 12:52
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boeing: 787 will fly before year's end now

Boeing today announced that they expect the Dreamliner to fly before years's end. However the plans to modify the wing are not ready yet. Deliveries will begin by end 2010 they say.

source (german)
Boeing: 787 wird noch in diesem Jahr zum Erstflug starten - Auslieferung ab Ende 2010 - FLUG REVUE
Kerosene Kraut is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2009, 13:02
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 3433N 06912E
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boeing today announced that they expect the Dreamliner to fly before years's end.
Any stipulation on which year's end ??
Bruce Wayne is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2009, 13:04
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: southwest
Age: 78
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So the 787-8 will enter service after the financial crisis, when traffic growth resumes in full swing. It will look very, very, small.
No widebody that size has ever been a commercial success, long-term.
Dysag is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2009, 17:30
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Manchester , UK
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The BBC have a nice comparison with the B787 and A350 ....

BBC NEWS | Business | Boeing 787 to fly by year's end

BBC seem to think the A350 entered service in 2007
mantug01 is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2009, 18:18
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scandinavia
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fairly accurate for the BBC, 2007, 2015 .. only 6 off...

But why does every report of this nature now have to include the obligatory A380 reference/comparison...A350 comparison or even 777/767/A330 I could handle but the A380 is build for a different market...

fc101
fc101 is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2009, 18:18
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Somewhere Over America
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sooooo they are going to scrap the first three?

AIRLINE BIZ Blog | The Dallas Morning News

Boeing says Boeing 787 will fly by end of 2009

9:21 AM Thu, Aug 27, 2009

Terry Maxon/Reporter

Boeing will have that Boeing 787 up and flying by the end of this year, the company said Thursday, and in the hands of its first customer by fourth quarter 2010.

We've lost count of the number of times the company has rescheduled that first flight and delivery, so let's just say this is the latest revision to the timetable.

Says Boeing:

"The new schedule reflects the previously announced need to reinforce an area within the side-of-body section of the aircraft, along with the addition of several weeks of schedule margin to reduce flight test and certification risk. The company projects achieving a production rate of 10 airplanes per month in late 2013."

Boeing had been looking at a Q2 2009 first flight, but on June 23 said the discovery of the weak area would delay test flights for the oft-delayed aircraft again.

There'll be a big accounting charge taken, even though the company says the 787 program is not in a "forward-loss position":

"However, separate from the updated program profitability assessment, the company has concluded that the initial flight-test airplanes have no commercial market value beyond the development effort due to the inordinate amount of rework and unique and extensive modifications made to those aircraft.

"Therefore, costs previously recorded for the first three flight-test airplanes will be reclassified from program inventory to research and development expense, resulting in an estimated non-cash charge of $2.5 billion pre-tax, or $2.21 per share, against third-quarter results. This charge will have no impact on the company's cash outlook going forward."

In other words, those first three airplanes won't be sold and delivered to customers. The company originally had planned to deliver all six test airplanes to customers. Boeing thinks it can sell Test Airplanes 4, 5 and 6, but not 1, 2 and 3.

In its announcement, Boeing said the team that is working on reinforcing the weak area "has completed initial testing and is finalizing design details of new fittings that are expected to ensure full structural integrity of the joint."

It said the company will repeat the static test procedure that uncovered the design problem and analyze the results before the first test flight.
Halfnut is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2009, 22:14
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Midlands
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Always read the small print.

If you want a chuckle, read the "small print" below the Boeing statement on their website.

I wonder, what could prompt such an addition to the good news?

Answers on a postcard please...
ohreally is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2009, 22:38
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: England
Age: 59
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"However, separate from the updated program profitability assessment, the company has concluded that the initial flight-test airplanes have no commercial market value beyond the development effort due to the inordinate amount of rework and unique and extensive modifications made to those aircraft.''

.....or they fall out of the sky.........

MM
mickyman is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2009, 23:20
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 1,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boeing thinks it can sell Test Airplanes 4, 5 and 6, but not 1, 2 and 3.

Test airplanes 4,5 and 6 are right up behind 1,2 and 3 on the production line. It's hard to believe they will not need the same amount of re-work as 1,2 and 3.
TSR2 is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2009, 08:15
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The first six are rebooked under R+D cost anyway.
Kerosene Kraut is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2009, 10:00
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stuck in the middle...
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Oh just add the go-fast nose and new donks to a 777 and be done with it already!

What's the American version of the Hyundai... ?
Taildragger67 is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2009, 15:03
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: London
Age: 36
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
flightglobal had a great poll a few weeks back:

What will fly first?
787 33%
A400M 21%
Pigs 46%
Total Votes: 4534
Poll ended on: 06 August 2009


i think that says it all


on a serious note though, Boeing thought they had the problem sorted, then realised it was worse than they thought. Now they have announced a new schedule, although the schedule has no dates, so at best its a guess. Even in their own press release they said they have included a "schedule margin" suggesting they don't honestly know. And if they have yet to make the ammendments to the aircraft, how will they know it will work.
They may have done computer simulations, but if computer simulations were accurate the 787 project wouldn't be nearly two years behind schedule
markch2000 is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2009, 22:26
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Balkan
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Few pix from June


storm_eagle is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2009, 17:24
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Hold
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boeing Dreamliner

I wonder if this is due to the carbon fibre technology being utilised is not resilient to high power ligtning stikes??
Boeing chief responsible for delayed Dreamliner retires - Telegraph
Raethmeon is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2009, 17:37
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Petaluma
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have been working two phase materials since the early fifties when Da brought 'EPON' home from the Lab. I have used it in autos, (Corvette) and a/c (Many). I left the field probably 20 years ago, and my opinions are rank amateur, though somewhat informed. Early, the theory that 'two phase' would be structural was not entertained, the challenge was to 'adhere' them to metallic structural mating for frame strength. Spars, ribs and longerons not to mention shackles and pins, as composites, is a challenge to my intuition. A 'heavy' price is paid for life limit structures, so the inherent advantage of composites is immediately lost. I see the dreamliner as an experiment, not as a mass produced aircraft, call me old fashioned.
Will Fraser is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.