Passenger plane almost crashed into mountain
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tu.114 View Post
So what do we know now?
- A crew got a bit closer to the mountains [....]
- This incident has been reported to SUST, be it immediately or a bit later[....]
So what do we know now?
- A crew got a bit closer to the mountains [....]
- This incident has been reported to SUST, be it immediately or a bit later[....]
I wonder, what would be not "A BIT" by your standards...excluding a crash, of course.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fairly close to the colonial capitol
Age: 55
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So again, I ask for anyone that may know this: In the states this incident likely would have been an ATC bust. Does Eurocontrol operate differently and is reporting (ATC) 'optional' in a case like this?
Pegase Driver
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does Eurocontrol operate differently and is reporting (ATC) 'optional' in a case like this
Remember also this was not an ILS but and IGS . You have a visual part in the end., and it is the pilot who is responsible for terrain clearance, not ATC.
On the Av Herald page there is a very interesting comment :
The IGS is not used by the DH8 due to systemic limitations with regards to maximum glideslope angle. The only approaches approved and used are the two LOC approaches leading to a circling into 19 and a visual approach into 01. No other approaches are executed.
If true, then they were on a visual leg, and the incident is an interesting one..and explains why the SUST is looking into it seriously.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fairly close to the colonial capitol
Age: 55
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thank you for the insight, ATC Watcher - an apropos user name, good sir.
I am surprised there lacks a cohesive set of rules in an area where borders are both numerous and near. I might guess then that the Swiss rules do not record an approach deviation in terminal airspace. On the airline side, there must have been no FOQA.
I am surprised there lacks a cohesive set of rules in an area where borders are both numerous and near. I might guess then that the Swiss rules do not record an approach deviation in terminal airspace. On the airline side, there must have been no FOQA.
Last edited by vapilot2004; 23rd Feb 2017 at 09:39.