Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

CRJ down in Sweden

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

CRJ down in Sweden

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Jan 2016, 11:39
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Slovakia
Age: 58
Posts: 277
Received 224 Likes on 37 Posts
Crash site found at 02:15z by RNoAF F16
I am bit surprised - at 2:15z it must have been completely dark, even Moon didn't help much. F-16 is a fast jet so my respect to the pilot who can find such a small trace at night. After crash fire maybe?
Pali is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2016, 11:45
  #22 (permalink)  
TWT
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: troposphere
Posts: 831
Received 34 Likes on 19 Posts
Infra-red detection on the F-16 perhaps ? Crash site would have been warmer than the surrounding snow after impact/fire ?
TWT is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2016, 11:51
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: NO
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, they've got pretty impressive IR/night vision. Plus location is probably almost exactly at last known radar contact? The first description of the site was also released well before daylight.
RYFQB is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2016, 13:37
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: NO
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IR video

Video captured by the F16 has been released:
Norske F-16 fant flyet - se video fra havaristedet - NRK Nordland - Lokale nyheter, TV og radio

Helo at the scene is Norwegian Air Ambulance.
RYFQB is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2016, 13:50
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: N/A
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Definitely too early to conclude with what happened. But as mentioned, the small crash area tells us that it was a nose down impact probably. T-tails(as the MD-80) have had problems with the jackscrew and the horizontal stabilizer earlier. This AC had 38 000 hours, and from 1993. Anybody know if the CRJ have any history with jackscrew fatigue?
k738 is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2016, 14:30
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Sweden
Age: 47
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Picture of the airplane in question, and a location.

http://gfx.nrk.no//SOwf0w-SW7Q7MgJXf...f6ARiioEE0AVPQ

This is above the Arctic Circle. Weather is probably -30C or more, most likely windy, making the chill really hard. This area has no roads due to the mountain terrain so you really need snow mobiles or helis to get there. The hours of daylight are very low, and the sun won't rise above the horizon at this latitude.

Another picture of the airplane, from Flightradar24 twitter:

MrSnuggles is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2016, 15:18
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,226
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Right off the top of my head, in 2 minutes I came up with 4 widely different scenarios that equally fit the known facts at this moment. Based on previous events with a similar profile - extreme dive from cruise altitude.

And I've probably missed a couple - aviation is pretty good at coming up with "new" holes in the cheese,, that we've never run across before.

I don't list them, because someone is sure to start "fixating" on one or the other - with 80%+ odds of being wrong. Which is a poor way to maintain credibility.

I expect additional information will be forthcoming, which will eliminate some of those scenarios, and point more strongly to others.
pattern_is_full is online now  
Old 8th Jan 2016, 15:31
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Newcastle
Age: 53
Posts: 613
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I hope they can recover the data from the CVR & FDR. It looks some impact that.
MATELO is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2016, 15:33
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That the crew were able to get out a (brief) mayday call eliminates certain scenarios too.
peekay4 is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2016, 16:30
  #30 (permalink)  
UV
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Essex
Posts: 651
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Regrettably PPRUNE at its very worst again. Maybe the mods will take a look at the Flyer forums where the Top Man closed the last two fatal accident threads due to this sort of inappropriate garbage.
UV is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2016, 18:27
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,408
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
I hope they can recover the data from the CVR & FDR. It looks some impact that.
My thoughts as well - that looks more like a meteor crater than an aircraft crash. Twenty year old recorders might not be up to it
tdracer is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2016, 20:31
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
While 9000fpm is fast its not THAT fast (its less than 100knots), and doesn't seem to be consistent with the speed of impact implied by the photos of the crash site. Since the crash site photo is "real" and the 9000fpm is a report and subject to being wrong for various reasons, based on the VERY limited info we have now i might be tempted to suggest they came down a LOT faster than that...
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2016, 20:48
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Not far from a big Lake
Age: 81
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
While 9000fpm is fast its not THAT fast (its less than 100knots), and doesn't seem to be consistent with the speed of impact implied by the photos of the crash site. Since the crash site photo is "real" and the 9000fpm is a report and subject to being wrong for various reasons, based on the VERY limited info we have now i might be tempted to suggest they came down a LOT faster than that...
I Agree
Looks to be closer to Mach 1 and 70 to 80 degrees ND.
Not pleasant to contemplate.
Machinbird is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2016, 21:31
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,907
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Interresting IR imagery indeed. Looks like a very high speed almost vertical impact. As others have mentioned this might have far exceeded the flight recorder design envelope. A pretty strange and dramatic one.
atakacs is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2016, 22:18
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: .
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since the crash site photo is "real" and the 9000fpm is a report and subject to being wrong for various reasons, based on the VERY limited info we have now i might be tempted to suggest they came down a LOT faster than that...
The maximum rate of descent was closer to 30,000fpm.
Nemrytter is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2016, 23:08
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Here and there
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If the figures quoted above are to be believed then my initial thought is an accident similar to this.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alas...nes_Flight_261
tubby linton is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2016, 03:24
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: usa
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
As an ex. 200 pilot, an incident that a colleague had, comes to mind..Thrust reverser cowl separated from the engine in flight, and hit the tail on the way out..Damage, but landed safely..


We do not know what happened to this aircraft, but they will find out..
My deepest sympathies to the friends and families..


Fly Safe..
B-757 is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2016, 11:05
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Blighty & Germania.
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like the ultimate vertical impact as the scatter is symmetrical. I doubt very much that this was any type of pilot error or bad weather. The big first two questions are, are the FDR and CVR readable and is there any sign of some part of the tail in a different location to the impact site??
skyship007 is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2016, 16:00
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Locating the "four corners" of the accident will be a first priority, to determine inflight breakup possibility.
barit1 is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2016, 17:05
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Sweden
Age: 47
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Parts of the black boxes have been found!

What parts, are not specified, but it seems they too were smashed to smithereens in the crash.

Delar av svarta lådan hittad - Nyheter | SVT.se

Vi har hittat vissa delar men inte kompletta enheter. Det kommer att ta dagar att hitta dem, säger Nicolas Seger.
Målsättningen är att vara klar med utredningen inom tolv månader, säger Nicolas Seger.
My translation:

We have found certain parts but no complete units. It will take days to find them, says Nicolas Seger.

The goal is to finish the investigation within twelve months, says Nicolas Seger.

(Comment: Nicolas Seger is heading the investigation for Haverikommissionen, the Swedish equivalent to AAIB/NTSB/BEA)

Last edited by MrSnuggles; 9th Jan 2016 at 17:06. Reason: clarifying Nicolas
MrSnuggles is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.