PPRuNe Forums


Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24th Mar 2014, 15:57   #7781 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Age: 62
Posts: 11
a bbc reporter has just been told by Inmarsat that their investigations were completed yesterday and involved the movements of other aircraft (some kind of more accurate calibration ?)
paultr is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2014, 15:58   #7782 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Singapore
Posts: 12
Quote:
There will be no prize for the best analysis or closest guess. Inmarsat, the AAIB, NTSB have got enough on thier plate right now without pandering to the " I demand to know" brigade..guess what - we don't need to know.
Wiggy I think we do need to know. We need to be confident that we can fly on 777s, that we can fly on Malaysia Airlines flights, that we can fly out of Malaysian airports. I agree with you that breathless speculation from fruitcakes on this site or from the press won' t get those questions answered, but the Malaysian government does need to get something out from its apparently interminable police investigation to start giving some assurance to all of us who fly in and out of Malaysia or on 777s.
Hornbill88 is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2014, 16:03   #7783 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,600
Malaysian Airlines MH370 contact lost

Posted that Doppler could solve the rough track of the aircraft back on the 16th. Looks as if thats how they managed to go firm on the southern route.

Quote:
Unless they have a truly tremendous receiver on the satellite, Doppler is only by a Hz or so, and would still not split North and South. The only way for Inmarsat to decide between tracks is on the possible routes highlighted by the series of eight pings.
Indicated doppler effect pops up on our FMS, typically depending on sat geometry, you are looking at between 10 and 50 Hz difference, so not insignificant I believe. With multiple sats and a few complex equations, you can get a rough derived relative track and velocity which it loos as if Inmarsat have done in this case.

Whether any other agencies have been involved in locating potential wreckage is irrelevant. All that matters is the families can get closure and a rough search area is established to determine what why and possibly who was responsible.
VinRouge is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2014, 16:03   #7784 (permalink)

 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 52
Posts: 4,263
ORAC

"a super-secret installation just outside Alice Springs -- remains cloaked in secrecy."

Pine Gap is NOT super secret anymore. A fair bit of what goes on was disclosed in a book written by a person who works inside and all of it was fully approved before release with more detail than people thought. The media however like to blow it up as "super secret".

As to whether JOHR was working, we don't need to be told, as long as the relevant information is passed on which it would have been.
500N is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2014, 16:03   #7785 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Age: 53
Posts: 314
Quote:
the " I demand to know" brigade..guess what - right now we don't need to know.
True.

I don't believe anyone here is demanding to know the details of "other means." We all surely accept that we won't be told - perhaps ever.

What I (and I think most people share) is a hope and conviction there is more information that will lead to the wreckage, lead to answers, and lead to closure for the relatives. Because the official information that has been released does not create very much hope of this.

I really don't give a damn exactly what this data is. I just hope it is there.

I believe this is the focus of most people here.
slats11 is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2014, 16:04   #7786 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: in the barrel
Posts: 19
While the media report that Najib Razak has now officially declared the plane as crashed with no survivors, based on satellite data analysis, I still feel uneasy about the whole case.

As far as I understand, actual debris from MH370 has not yet been found and positively identified. In that light, I consider Razak's statement as the most probable outcome, but in no way confirmed.

To me, it appears that due to public pressure and because of the upcoming car racing event, the Malaysian government wants to put a quick end to the story.

A lot of loose ends still need to be tied up.
AviatorDave is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2014, 16:10   #7787 (permalink)

 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Dubai
Posts: 91
MAS statement

"On behalf of all of us at Malaysia Airlines and all Malaysians, our prayers go out to all the loved ones of the 226 passengers and of our 13 friends and colleagues at this enormously painful time".

226 ? or 227 ? souls onboard
JamesGV is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2014, 16:12   #7788 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 42
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShenziRubani View Post
I can't believe some are still believing in their conspiracy theories and not accept that it could just be the result of a catastrophic decompression
In the past 15 years, the majority of fatal crashes during cruise flight were due to terrorism and pilot suicide.

I think there were only 2 passenger airliner crashes caused by mechanical reasons in the past 15 years (China Airlines disintegrating in flight, and Helios Airways loss of cabin pressure). Compare this to 3 pilot suicides during the same time period alone.
cockpitvisit is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2014, 16:13   #7789 (permalink)

 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Dubai
Posts: 91
Pax manifest

http://www.malaysiaairlines.com/cont...ationality.pdf

227
JamesGV is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2014, 16:18   #7790 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Age: 53
Posts: 314
Thats very interesting. Why then did he say 226?
slats11 is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2014, 16:26   #7791 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Planet Earth (sometimes)
Posts: 3,612
Quote:
Wiggy I think we do need to know.
I accept that from a customer and crew confidence point of view we need to know what happened to cause the accident as quickly as possible. My issue is with those who seem to need to know the source of every piece of information...if the AAIB want to claim that they worked out the possible position all by themselves without the help of the NSA or even GCHQ, I personally have no problem with that, and if the authorities want to keep any presumed liason secret so be it - that's the sort of thing we don't need to know, all IMHO of course.
wiggy is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2014, 16:30   #7792 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: CGK
Age: 53
Posts: 7
Inmarsat calculations

Quote:
I have been thinking of this. There were hourly pings which can be used to calculate the arcs. Distance between the arcs gives the average hourly speed towards the satellite. Doppler data would give the momentary speed towards the satellite at the moment of the ping. Doppler data would not give too much additional information, but would curtail the set of possible tracks.
I have always been sceptical that the logs would contain detailed enough data to estimate speed. Why would a desperate-for-storage-space engineer add logs for such extraneous information? (If she did, hats off as it may have made a difference to this investigation.)

Quote:
Another possibility could be, that inmarsat had ping data from previous flights in their logs. If this data contains signal strength it could be feasible to calculate the radiation pattern of the a/c antenna. If there was a significant asymmetry in the a/c antenna it could be deduced whether the starboard or port side of the antenna pointed to the satellite.
Again, I doubt they would give scarce log space for signal strength data, unless it serves other purposes. I wonder if they haven't been using the slight variations above / below the equator that the satellite travels, with an assumption of constant speed and bearing, to eliminate the northern arc.
JakartaDean is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2014, 16:33   #7793 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 85
As if all the various governments and their militaries don't already know what capabilities there are out there? During this time of tragedy and confusion, classifying everything as a state secret, not sharing data with other agencies/governments or the media, and worst of all the families who are being dragged through emotional roller coaster after emotional roller coaster is all quite ridiculous. We are not living in the cold war where everyone is a spy and every country is trying to destroy you. This emotional scaring of the people who lived through those times is still quite apparent unfortunately. But the past decades it has been to the detriment of the rest of society than some people refuse to drop the us vs them belief.
413X3 is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2014, 16:39   #7794 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: 41N
Posts: 5
227 pax or 226?

Originally was 227 pax and 12 crew, later they mention flight engineer as being there- standby travel? So it comes as 13 from MAS, 226 remaining as Pax
Nik4Me is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2014, 16:47   #7795 (permalink)

Keeping Danny in Sandwiches
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: UK
Age: 68
Posts: 1,234
"Inmarsat saying they have used Doppler effect to isolate the southern corridor and tested the theory on known flights. Hence their latest conclusion. Can only give a general location."

Some of us on PPRuNe were discussing the probability of that a couple of days ago.
sky9 is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2014, 16:47   #7796 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 152
JakartaDean,

Quote:
I have always been sceptical that the logs would contain detailed enough data to estimate speed. Why would a desperate-for-storage-space engineer add logs for such extraneous information? (If she did, hats off as it may have made a difference to this investigation.)
That was my first thought too. But on second thought the single downlink sat -> ground station probably needs as much resources as one link between a/c and sat. To communicate with the a/c the sat has to "illuminate" the whole hemisphere to be receivable by a tiny a/c antenna. In contrast to that the downlink to the ground station can be one concentrated beam and the antenna on the ground can be huge.

Thus the resources spend for the one beamed downlink to the ground station are negligible in comparison to the thousands of unbeamed links to the a/c and ships. So why not use the "cheap" bandwith in the downlink to relay all data available to the ground.

BTW: Newer Aero-C Terminals have automatic doppler comensation. Aero-C - Products - Aero - - Thrane & Thrane
Maybe older terminals required assistance from the satellite for that compensation, which would explain, why the sat "knows" the speed of the terminal.
OleOle is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2014, 16:52   #7797 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Boston ,UK
Age: 40
Posts: 3
The fire scenario has been mentioned before but if you think about the radar data indicating a climb to 4x000 feet then a sudden dive(Not sure if this information was validated or not)

Is that the move of a pilot trying to extinguish a fire? Has this happened and knocked out a lot of key systems
sterion75 is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2014, 16:56   #7798 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6
No, the flight engineer doesn't work for MAS. He works for a private jet firm.

So the numbers still don't tally.
lilkim is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2014, 17:02   #7799 (permalink)

 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Dubai
Posts: 91
Nik4Me

I didn't know that.

There was mention of a "flight engineer" in the early stages.
He was Mohd Khairul working in private aviation as a Flight Mechanic.

The "13th" MAS employee onboard was a "Flight Engineer" ?
JamesGV is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2014, 17:05   #7800 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Clarty Waters, UK
Age: 51
Posts: 695
Quote:
Originally Posted by sterion75 View Post
....the radar data indicating a climb to 4x000 feet ......
4x000 feet?????

Quote:
Originally Posted by sterion75 View Post
Is that the move of a pilot trying to extinguish a fire?
This was speculated on several days ago, and an actual 777 pilot dismissed the notion as implausible.
Andy_S is offline  
Closed Thread


Tags
acars, crash, elt, hf links, malaysian, mh370, missing, pingers, plane, vhf

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 00:08.


1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1