Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

PIA Jumbo engine clobbered at XXX

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

PIA Jumbo engine clobbered at XXX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Jul 2005, 08:01
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: British Isles
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PIA Jumbo engine clobbered at XXX

PIA 747 in XXX over the last few days had an engine clobbered by a baggage truck, in fact got wedged underneath. Made worse when the guy tried to reverse out. 15 inch gash in nacelle filled with foam and speed tape before being despatched to home base. Was an inspection of the mounting bolts carried out I wonder?

ATB,
ptc

Last edited by peeteechase; 7th Jul 2005 at 13:00.
peeteechase is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2005, 02:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Bechuanaland
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So exactly where is XXX?

Any further details?
Dagger Dirk is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2005, 15:17
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Dublin
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have never been to airport XXX but obviously PIA have,maybe I should check their flying schedule.
PIA are well known for Gash Repair jobs to their A/C in order to return to base where labour is 10% of the cost of Europe or the U.S. I dont know the details of this story but maybe irs possible if you deactivate the Reverser and do a Core Engine Area Inspection to confirm no Engine Damage that G.E. would permit such a repair as a temporary measure. All Nacelles are double skinned and don't forget their primary purpose is to ensure that engine Fire Extinguishing agent would be effective if required. Thrust Reverser & Secondary Gaspath flow while Important are only Secondary Functions...
Flying Mech is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2005, 16:45
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At XXX they are handled by engineering from another airline (at the moment), they refused to do any repair until authority was received from tech services etc for the type of repair to be done, what materials were required, what inspections were needed etc etc. So no gash repair was carried out, all necessary inspections were carried out, the reverser was locked out all iaw MM and approved documents etc etc.

However in the very near future they will be self handling at XXX now that will be a different ball game! As at the moment they are watching what is done by the engineers from the other airline (to see how it's done properly maybe!) and the suggestion was put forward to use speed tape and send it on it's way! Which was politely declined, I'm told.

15 inch gash in nacelle filled with foam and speed tape before being despatched
sorry but utter rubbish.
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2005, 22:39
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can we best guess that XXX is somewere in the north of England.

Can we best guess that PIA operate 4 or 5 flights Daily


So says the slug ..............
master slug is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2005, 22:05
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: British Isles
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks spanners,

sorry but utter rubbish.
Good to hear,

ATB,
ptc
peeteechase is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2005, 10:01
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,500
Received 165 Likes on 89 Posts
However in the very near future they will be self handling at XXX now that will be a different ball game! As at the moment they are watching what is done by the engineers from the other airline (to see how it's done properly maybe!) and the suggestion was put forward to use speed tape and send it on it's way! Which was politely declined, I'm told.
Apparently, PIA have asked the two airlines who look after their fleets at XXX to carry on as their own engineering are not up to the job just yet.

One of them has said "no thanks"
TURIN is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2005, 17:54
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

You might well find both have!
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2005, 20:46
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well has anybody thought about discussing , the great driving abilities of the supposedly well trained ground staff at xxx . Not to mention the cost and inconvenience caused to the airline and pax because of this incident.

BM
bigmountain is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2005, 22:21
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,500
Received 165 Likes on 89 Posts
Who said they were well trained at driving?
TURIN is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.