Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Bell 222UT Cat A Ops

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Bell 222UT Cat A Ops

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Jun 2017, 20:27
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: South Africa
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bell 222UT Cat A Ops

Does anyone perhaps know of a B222UT publication pertaining to Cat A operations, and more specifically for Helideck and/or Short Field ops? The RFM has limited Cat A information and any other material would be highly appreciated.

FD
Flatdog is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2017, 06:48
  #2 (permalink)  
hueyracer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have never flown the 222, but from talking to pilots who did i dont believe the aircraft is certified for CAT A......anyone?
 
Old 5th Jun 2017, 09:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Section 6 of the 222 RFM.
PM me for a copy and I'll see if I can dig it out.
Kalif is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2017, 10:00
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South East Asia
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bell 222UT Cat A Ops

Back in the early-to-mid 1990's East Asia Airlines, operating both 222B's and 222UT's between Hong Kong and Macau were using Cat A (elevated platform) performance for all take-offs and landings. I don't recall the AFM authority but if you hit a brick-wall I'm sure someone at Bell may be able to help.
Saint Jack is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2017, 22:40
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: South Carolina, USA
Age: 79
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Throughout the 1990s rooftop helipads at Medical Center in US. All takeoffs were Cat A. Dive for the doctor's parking lot get to VTOSS and go about your business. This was the 222UT Air Methods)
cbags is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2017, 23:58
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by cbags
Throughout the 1990s rooftop helipads at Medical Center in US. All takeoffs were Cat A. Dive for the doctor's parking lot get to VTOSS and go about your business. This was the 222UT Air Methods)
Were they true CAT A (weights, temperature etc) or were they simply flying the CAT A profile but outside the parameters? Was it certified CAT A with the relevant supplements?
havick is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2017, 07:30
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,287
Received 510 Likes on 212 Posts
Knowing Air Meth at that time....I bet the answer is not one they would like being discussed in a Civil Suit following a crash.
SASless is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2017, 13:28
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanaka, NZ
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Saint Jack
Back in the early-to-mid 1990's East Asia Airlines, operating both 222B's and 222UT's between Hong Kong and Macau were using Cat A (elevated platform) performance for all take-offs and landings....
Elevated helipads at both ends, and lots of drop-down available if needed. Plenty of drop-down at the Coloane hangar as well, which one unfortunate 222 got to experience, al-be-it on its own solo suicide mission.
gulliBell is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2017, 08:19
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South East Asia
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe the "solo suicide mission" that gulliBell is referring to is the roll-over of a 222 while an engineer was performing a maintenance ground-run. Although the helicopter was destroyed and the bulk-fuel installation badly damaged, the engineer and mechanic were only slightly shaken. At that time, East Asia Airlines was one of the few "progressive" operators that permitted trained and certified senior engineers to perform maintenance ground-runs on their helicopters (up to 100% Nr, flat pitch only). This company approval meant that maintenance personnel didn't have to sit around waiting for a pilot to show-up for a ground-run and that pilots didn't have to wait around at the end of their shift until, for example, the engines cooled sufficiently for a compressor wash to be accomplished. Essentially it was a win-win situation for both parties. Apologies for thread drift.
Saint Jack is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2017, 11:41
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
So the end result of being 'progressive' was the destruction of an airframe and major damage to a bulk fuel installation?
Makes one appreciate 'by the book' operations.
etudiant is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.