The EASA Enroute Instrument Rating
Is it possible to "stop in midair 500ft AGL at the inner marker" and then to "hand fly a CAT-III" approach in a helicopter? No, it's not.
But I feel that I would be wasting my time because whatever I tell you, you will always know best. I'm out.
Pls. give it a final try.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Age: 72
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes
on
14 Posts
Hmm, groping around in bad weather when you start off vaguely knowing where you are is a LOT different to being in the soup and trying to get out of it. Helicopters have a minimum speed for the stabilising surfaces to kick in, which is mostly around 45 knots, near 70-odd in a Dauphin, so hovering IMC is out.
We used to do ILSs at Belfast down to about 100 feet in our Beavers and I can assure you it is not fun. I certainly wouldn't like to do that in a helicopter.
Phil
We used to do ILSs at Belfast down to about 100 feet in our Beavers and I can assure you it is not fun. I certainly wouldn't like to do that in a helicopter.
Phil
so hovering IMC is out
We used to do ILSs at Belfast down to about 100 feet in our Beavers and I can assure you it is not fun. I certainly wouldn't like to do that in a helicopter.
So this is exactly what I'm very intersted in:
why - if I understood correctly - would you do that Belfast thing rather in an IFR-Beaver than an IFR-Heli?
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Age: 72
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes
on
14 Posts
As anyone who has flown a Beaver will tell you, they are completely trustworthy and, as mentioned above, aeroplanes are inherently more stable, and this particular Beaver stalled at around 30 kts - in fact we often took off across the runway if the crosswind was bad enough. We also had a full IFR fit plus Decca, so we didn't get lost
Of course, it was in the military, so things were a little different - we had good reason to go off in bad weather. Certain pilots I know were doing radar approaches in Bell 47s with that basic instrument fit. I was happier doing that in the Scout.
I don't recommend a 45 kts stalling speed in any helicopter - they don't have one. The minimum IFR speed will be in the flight manual
Phil
Of course, it was in the military, so things were a little different - we had good reason to go off in bad weather. Certain pilots I know were doing radar approaches in Bell 47s with that basic instrument fit. I was happier doing that in the Scout.
I don't recommend a 45 kts stalling speed in any helicopter - they don't have one. The minimum IFR speed will be in the flight manual
Phil
particular Beaver stalled at around 30 kts - in fact we often took off across the runway if the crosswind was bad enough. We also had a full IFR fit plus Decca, so we didn't get lost
Of course, it was in the military, so things were a little different - we had good reason to go off in bad weather. Certain pilots I know were doing radar approaches in Bell 47s with that basic instrument fit. I was happier doing that in the Scout.
Of course, it was in the military, so things were a little different - we had good reason to go off in bad weather. Certain pilots I know were doing radar approaches in Bell 47s with that basic instrument fit. I was happier doing that in the Scout.
I don't recommend a 45 kts stalling speed in any helicopter
The minimum IFR speed will be in the flight manual
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In the Alps
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Swiss cloudbreaking license
Some more info on the swiss national license, also called HDF (helicopter departure in fog):
Required conditions: lower cloud ceiling not higher than 200m, max cloud layer thickness 300m, VFR on top. You can do this on controlled airports on the runway (e.g. zurich has published a procedure) or also outside controlled airspace and it's also not even required to start from an airport. There is a common frequency for starts outside controlled aispace.
Again, the main point of this is to get out of an inversion which you cannot underfly (hence the limit of 200m).
Required conditions: lower cloud ceiling not higher than 200m, max cloud layer thickness 300m, VFR on top. You can do this on controlled airports on the runway (e.g. zurich has published a procedure) or also outside controlled airspace and it's also not even required to start from an airport. There is a common frequency for starts outside controlled aispace.
Again, the main point of this is to get out of an inversion which you cannot underfly (hence the limit of 200m).
Thx. for the info, very interesting!
How does the pilot assert this condition when planning the flight (to the extent of plausible deniability of deliberate violation) ?
Hmm, you mean "VFR over the top" VFR over-the-top - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"VFR on top" is an (FAA defined) IFR term, granted by ATC, not relieving them from seaparation duties!
VFR-on-top - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Just clarifying terms because there might be one or two 'murricans on the forum.
Smart. For pilot to pilot communication or for talking to the FIR admin?
max cloud layer thickness 300m
VFR on top
"VFR on top" is an (FAA defined) IFR term, granted by ATC, not relieving them from seaparation duties!
VFR-on-top - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Just clarifying terms because there might be one or two 'murricans on the forum.
common frequency for starts outside controlled aispace
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In the Alps
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How does the pilot assert this condition when planning the flight (to the extent of plausible deniability of deliberate violation) ?
1. Metar from Airport / ask incoming planes
2. Webcams (there are plenty around nowadays)
I meant "VFR on top" in the sense of VMC conditions above the cloud layer.
The common frequency is for blind transmissions (pilot-to-pilot), there is no ATC in uncontrolled airspace. If you start from or ascend into controlled airspace, then of course you talk to the appropriate ATC station.