Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

The EASA Enroute Instrument Rating

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

The EASA Enroute Instrument Rating

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Oct 2014, 20:00
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: LOWW
Posts: 345
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Is it possible to "stop in midair 500ft AGL at the inner marker" and then to "hand fly a CAT-III" approach in a helicopter? No, it's not.
But I feel that I would be wasting my time because whatever I tell you, you will always know best. I'm out.
I don't know IMC, how should I. I'm merely presenting ideas, eager to leran about the topic by ingesting the falsification of them by the people in the know.
Pls. give it a final try.
Reely340 is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2014, 20:22
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Age: 72
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 14 Posts
Hmm, groping around in bad weather when you start off vaguely knowing where you are is a LOT different to being in the soup and trying to get out of it. Helicopters have a minimum speed for the stabilising surfaces to kick in, which is mostly around 45 knots, near 70-odd in a Dauphin, so hovering IMC is out.

We used to do ILSs at Belfast down to about 100 feet in our Beavers and I can assure you it is not fun. I certainly wouldn't like to do that in a helicopter.

Phil
paco is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2014, 07:48
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: LOWW
Posts: 345
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
so hovering IMC is out
Got that. Was only an extreme exaggeration to outline how I depict helicopters being very different from planes.

We used to do ILSs at Belfast down to about 100 feet in our Beavers and I can assure you it is not fun. I certainly wouldn't like to do that in a helicopter.
Interesting. Them Beavers stall at 40kt-ish, you recommended 45kt as min. heli maneuvering speed.

So this is exactly what I'm very intersted in:
why - if I understood correctly - would you do that Belfast thing rather in an IFR-Beaver than an IFR-Heli?
Reely340 is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2014, 16:34
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Age: 72
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 14 Posts
As anyone who has flown a Beaver will tell you, they are completely trustworthy and, as mentioned above, aeroplanes are inherently more stable, and this particular Beaver stalled at around 30 kts - in fact we often took off across the runway if the crosswind was bad enough. We also had a full IFR fit plus Decca, so we didn't get lost

Of course, it was in the military, so things were a little different - we had good reason to go off in bad weather. Certain pilots I know were doing radar approaches in Bell 47s with that basic instrument fit. I was happier doing that in the Scout.

I don't recommend a 45 kts stalling speed in any helicopter - they don't have one. The minimum IFR speed will be in the flight manual

Phil
paco is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2014, 16:53
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guys, I reely think you're being wound up. Surely?!
rotorspeed is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2014, 17:07
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: LOWW
Posts: 345
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
particular Beaver stalled at around 30 kts - in fact we often took off across the runway if the crosswind was bad enough. We also had a full IFR fit plus Decca, so we didn't get lost

Of course, it was in the military, so things were a little different - we had good reason to go off in bad weather. Certain pilots I know were doing radar approaches in Bell 47s with that basic instrument fit. I was happier doing that in the Scout.
Must have been interesting times.

I don't recommend a 45 kts stalling speed in any helicopter
Misunderstanding, I didn't say you do.

The minimum IFR speed will be in the flight manual
'kay, noted.
Reely340 is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2014, 21:11
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In the Alps
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
People also forget that flying VMC on top also breaks the performance rules.
Are you referring to CAT ? Private vfr flights on top are legal imho.
jymil is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2014, 21:32
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In the Alps
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Swiss cloudbreaking license

Some more info on the swiss national license, also called HDF (helicopter departure in fog):

Required conditions: lower cloud ceiling not higher than 200m, max cloud layer thickness 300m, VFR on top. You can do this on controlled airports on the runway (e.g. zurich has published a procedure) or also outside controlled airspace and it's also not even required to start from an airport. There is a common frequency for starts outside controlled aispace.

Again, the main point of this is to get out of an inversion which you cannot underfly (hence the limit of 200m).
jymil is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2014, 06:41
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: LOWW
Posts: 345
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Thx. for the info, very interesting!

max cloud layer thickness 300m
How does the pilot assert this condition when planning the flight (to the extent of plausible deniability of deliberate violation) ?

VFR on top
Hmm, you mean "VFR over the top" VFR over-the-top - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"VFR on top" is an (FAA defined) IFR term, granted by ATC, not relieving them from seaparation duties!
VFR-on-top - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Just clarifying terms because there might be one or two 'murricans on the forum.

common frequency for starts outside controlled aispace
Smart. For pilot to pilot communication or for talking to the FIR admin?
Reely340 is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2014, 16:04
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In the Alps
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How does the pilot assert this condition when planning the flight (to the extent of plausible deniability of deliberate violation) ?
Several ways:
1. Metar from Airport / ask incoming planes
2. Webcams (there are plenty around nowadays)

I meant "VFR on top" in the sense of VMC conditions above the cloud layer.
The common frequency is for blind transmissions (pilot-to-pilot), there is no ATC in uncontrolled airspace. If you start from or ascend into controlled airspace, then of course you talk to the appropriate ATC station.
jymil is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.