Boeing 737 ng go around checklist procedure
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: australia
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Boeing 737 ng go around checklist procedure
Dear all,
Scenario, you have conducted a 1 engine inoperative go around and conduct the after take off checklist.
However when it comes to the descent and approach checklist, should you read the whole procedure from the One Engine Inoperative Landing QRH ie re read the condition again etc... or do you simply go into the Deferred Items area of the One Engine Inoperative Landing QRH ie the approach and descent checklist bit?
Thank you.
Scenario, you have conducted a 1 engine inoperative go around and conduct the after take off checklist.
However when it comes to the descent and approach checklist, should you read the whole procedure from the One Engine Inoperative Landing QRH ie re read the condition again etc... or do you simply go into the Deferred Items area of the One Engine Inoperative Landing QRH ie the approach and descent checklist bit?
Thank you.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: I wish I knew
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No, you read the" differred": Descent checklist, approach check list then the landing checklist.No need to mention anything else as the NNC checklist for the "condition" has already been completed.
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: N5552.0W00419.0ish
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just a thought-
Some of the conditions that existed when the one engine inoperative landing checklist was last actioned may now have changed, even if only marginally. At the least an acknowledgement of this, plus a change in landing mass (500-700kg lighter, maybe) before making the decision to go back into the deferred items.
It may sound pedantic, and may be different between companies, but certainly, (from personal experience) this has resulted in an eagle eyed TRE adding a little complication for later discussion at the end of a sim, if they weren't considered.
Some of the conditions that existed when the one engine inoperative landing checklist was last actioned may now have changed, even if only marginally. At the least an acknowledgement of this, plus a change in landing mass (500-700kg lighter, maybe) before making the decision to go back into the deferred items.
It may sound pedantic, and may be different between companies, but certainly, (from personal experience) this has resulted in an eagle eyed TRE adding a little complication for later discussion at the end of a sim, if they weren't considered.
