Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Can SAR Heli use 121.5 as a VOR?

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Can SAR Heli use 121.5 as a VOR?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Oct 2016, 12:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Broughton, UK
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Can SAR Heli use 121.5 as a VOR?

We are just talking in our aircraft owners group about the ELT / PLB options. I wondered, once your aircraft had sunk beneath the waves, if a hand-held radio on 121.5 could be used as a VOR beacon by the SAR bods, whilst you bob up and down in the life-raft?
.
scifi is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2016, 13:01
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In an ever changing place
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They could DF on a transmission from 121.5 and 243 or if your ELT is transmitting DF to the signal.
Above The Clouds is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2016, 13:36
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ansião (PT)
Posts: 2,785
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
@T/S: "to use as a VOR" they cannot, because it doesn't behave like a VOR, it behaves rather like an NDB. Shouting "I am here! I am here!" but without adding any directional information, which is the essential advantage of a VOR over an NDB. And by the way your PLB and ELT will be doing the exact same thing if/when activated (plus they may be adding useful information such as GPS-derived coordinates).

But it has rightly been stated that, among an impressive load of equipment, the rescue crew are bound to have some kind of direction finder which they can apply to anything you are transmitting with. With particular attention for the civilian distress frequencies of 121,5 and 406 MHz. They may even well be able to home in into your mobile phone.
Jan Olieslagers is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2016, 16:13
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 685
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Jan Olieslagers
They may even well be able to home in into your mobile phone.
I am pretty sure they can't do this.

406MHz PLBs also transmit on 121.5 for just this reason - so that SAR can home in on you at relatively short ranges.
hoodie is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2016, 20:34
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ansião (PT)
Posts: 2,785
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
if your ELT is transmitting DF to the signal
Excuse me if I'm stupid but I really can't get anything out of this phrase. Care to explain?
Jan Olieslagers is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2016, 20:46
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In an ever changing place
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jan Olieslagers
Excuse me if I'm stupid but I really can't get anything out of this phrase. Care to explain?
DF, direction finding to a particular signal be it voice on VHF 121.50 or UHF 243 or an ELT signal and also GPS signals from PLB,s
Mobile phones, not yet
Above The Clouds is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2016, 21:08
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ansião (PT)
Posts: 2,785
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Ok, thanks, but an ELT does not transmit DF specifically, or does it?

For as little as I know about HF-electronics (I always considered it a kind of black art ... ) DF is done on the receiving side, not at the transmitter?

And if "transmitting DF" confuses me, I'm afraid I am utterly flabbergasted with "transmitting DF to the signal" - perhaps I am too much trying to understand? What is being meant?
Jan Olieslagers is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2016, 21:31
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: same planet as yours
Posts: 551
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by hoodie
I am pretty sure they can't do this.
at least on an experimental basis, some mountain/snow avalanche rescue helo's can home in on a cell phone signal.

They could DF on a transmission from 121.5 and 243 or if your ELT is transmitting, (they could) DF to the signal.
pretty sure this is what was meant by that post. So no 'transmitting DF to the signal' without the comma.
DIBO is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2016, 22:02
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,581
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
To direction find a radio signal you need a carrier wave, so any transmitter that produces a carrier, typically an AM airband transmitter, then it can be located. Phone signals tend to be transmitted in bursts or packets, so do not lend themselves to conventional DF. Phone locations are determined by ranging from the different cells that they communicate with, not much use off the coast in a dinghy!
Whopity is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2016, 22:19
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 4,379
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Jan Olieslagers
Ok, thanks, but an ELT does not transmit DF specifically, or does it?

For as little as I know about HF-electronics (I always considered it a kind of black art ... ) DF is done on the receiving side, not at the transmitter?

And if "transmitting DF" confuses me, I'm afraid I am utterly flabbergasted with "transmitting DF to the signal" - perhaps I am too much trying to understand? What is being meant?
If you genuinely don't understand this stuff then it is worth raising with your peers and have a crewroom round robin.

ELTs do not work on HF.

121.5 is VHF and the civilian normal frequency band, 243.0 is UHF and used by the military. An ELT is a transmitting 'beacon' on which a suitably equipped aircraft can home using what is essentially a variant of an ADF, able to receive the VHF and/or UHF bands.

DF (Direction Finding) is what an ADF does using signals from an NDB; we also used to tune in to commercial radio stations on a boring leg, or even use the transmission from the station to track for the transmitting antennae co-located with a small township where no enroute beacons existed in the GAFA.

So for the OP: yes, that's always been what an ELT/PLB/SARBE is designed for. To provide a homing signal on which another aircraft can find you

Modern ELTs are required to use 406mHz and be located by satellite. The location is then transmitted to the National SAR Centre for the area in which the distress call is received. The more expensive/better equipped 406 units will have inbuilt GPS which will significantly refine the location for searching.
John Eacott is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2016, 22:20
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Behind the curve
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The old S61N helicopters certainly could home to a 121.5 AM signal or, for that matter, any AM signal radiating in the aeronautical VHF spectrum. One of the two VHF transceivers was connected to a homing device, which drove a needle display. Now I must correct what I wrote earlier, but time has eroded the memory somewhat. It was a crude and basic display of signal strength and I think the procedure was to fly on any constant heading until the needle showed maximum gain and continue flying the same heading until the signal started to weaken.


Then turn 180 degrees and fly back to the point of maximum gain. At this point there was the choice of whether to turn left or right. If the aircraft was turned 90 degrees and the signal started to weaken, then simply turn back to the reciprocal and hopefully the aircraft would be going in the general direction of the beacon transmission. Those were the days! Oooaarrrh, Tom me lad. Shiver me timbers! Lash me to the wheel and hand me my trusty GPS. Don't even get me going on the joys of Decca Mk 19 hyperbolic navigation with moving "toilet roll" maps.

I'm fairly certain that some of the AS332L Super Pumas had something similar and I would think it unlikely in the extreme that the modern S92 SAR aircraft aren't fitted with an even better version of these homers. After all, it's their "bread and butter", their whole raison d'etre!

Last edited by Colibri49; 3rd Oct 2016 at 00:07.
Colibri49 is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2016, 02:55
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,952
Received 398 Likes on 210 Posts
"Violet Picture" anyone? I must be old.
megan is online now  
Old 3rd Oct 2016, 06:40
  #13 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 426 Likes on 225 Posts
Originally Posted by megan
"Violet Picture" anyone? I must be old.
Old? Don't worry....It's not just you.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2016, 07:56
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,821
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
Certain modern military aircraft have DF receivers which cover the VHF navigation frequencies, VHF civil and military bands, Marine band, military UHF and 406 MHz PLB frequencies.

So if you're bobbing about in the briny with a decent 406 MHz PLB, it won't be long before you're located!
BEagle is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2016, 08:05
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,555
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
It's not that modern - FWIW RAF Seakings were DF'ing (somehow) onto VHF/UHF ELT signals as far back as the early 80s..

and it worked very well.
wiggy is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2016, 08:12
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 4,379
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by wiggy
It's not that modern - FWIW RAF Seakings were DF'ing (somehow) onto VHF/UHF ELT signals as far back as the early 80s..

and it worked very well.
My goodness, did they really?

Following the RN Sea Kings in 1970, and the Wessex in the 1960's and the Whirlwind: Violet Picture was the DF display

As already stated, yes the CivSAR are all able to find you with your ELT
John Eacott is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2016, 08:14
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,555
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Thanks John, no idea it went back that far.....just wanted to make the point DFing sn't a new fangled gizmo thingy....worked really well one dark and stormy night when I needed it...

Last edited by wiggy; 3rd Oct 2016 at 08:26.
wiggy is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2016, 09:12
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ansião (PT)
Posts: 2,785
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
@DIBO: thanks, that one comma does make a world of difference. A pity not everybody takes care - and that some, like myself, tend to read literally...
Jan Olieslagers is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2016, 09:27
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,821
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
My point was that certain modern military aircraft have DF receivers which cover a vastly greater range of frequencies and modes than did old helicopters' systems.

DF'ing a 156.8 MHz FM signal from a mariner in trouble is a handy function - particularly as the aircraft can also communicate on the same frequency and mode.
BEagle is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2016, 09:48
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 4,379
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Certainly modern aircraft have far more sophisticated receivers; it's to be expected. But Violet Picture goes back to the 1960s and was used on far more than just SAR aircraft and had more uses than finding SARBE transmissions.

We had them in bog standard squadron aircraft and were routinely trained in their use for locating a beacon, but the stiff-wing also had them for such odd routines as finding the tanker, as BEagle will no doubt tell.

So the ability to find an ELT has been around in most military rotary squadrons for well over half a century, and has only got better as technology improves. Us old f@rts are harking back to that strange era, pre-mobile phones, pre-internet, pre-digital computers and pre-PC!
John Eacott is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.