Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

LCY Zone transit

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

LCY Zone transit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Aug 2016, 07:21
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,815
Received 95 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by ShyTorque
No, they certainly aren't!
Don't know what 'the book' says nowadays but it used to say 'sufficient height to alight without danger to persons or property' rather than 'alight clear' as for fixed wing.
chevvron is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2016, 12:31
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,982
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Talkdownman, many thanks
fireflybob is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2016, 12:44
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It now says:

SERA.3105 Minimum heights
Except when necessary for take-off or landing, or except by permission from the competent authority, aircraft shall not be flown over the congested areas of cities, towns or settlements or over an open-air assembly of persons, unless at such a height as will permit, in the event of an emergency arising, a landing to be made without undue hazard to persons or property on the surface. The minimum heights for VFR flights shall be those specified in SERA.5005(f) and minimum levels for IFR flights shall be those specified in SERA.5015(b).

SERA.5005
(f) Except when necessary for take-off or landing, or except by permission from the competent authority, a VFR flight shall not be flown:
(1) over the congested areas of cities, towns or settlements or over an open-air assembly of persons at a height less than 300 m (1 000 ft) above the highest obstacle within a radius of 600 m from the aircraft;
(2) elsewhere than as specified in (1), at a height less than 150 m (500 ft) above the ground or water, or 150 m (500 ft) above the highest obstacle within a radius of 150 m (500 ft) from the aircraft.

In other words the rule for fixed wing has be changed to what the rule has always been for rotary wing. Which is why the former opinions from the CAA carry less weight than they might otherwise do. It is no longer necessary for an aeroplane to land "clear of the congested area", only "without undue hazard to persons or property on the surface" which may be within the congested area or outside it. Please don't mistake this comment for a suggestion that it is easy to land within any congested area without undue hazard to persons or property on the surface!
bookworm is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2016, 17:18
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lestah
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In answer to the OP question, yes they will. Many people are surprised by this, but if you don't ask......

They will give you a routing to follow and a max altitude on their QNH.

If you transit the Luton corridor on your way down, and tell them your intentions, they may give you a direct hand over. This helps alot, as City then expect your call and you miss out calling the busy Farnborough crew.

Last time we did it, we passed abeam the eastern end of the runway. Have your camera ready for some nice shots.

Both City and Luton Couldn't have been more helpful tbh. Not tried it 'tother way.

Last edited by Local Variation; 26th Aug 2016 at 17:19. Reason: Spelling
Local Variation is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2016, 18:16
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Local Variation
Many people are surprised by this
Why should that be? It's a Class D CTR same as any other Class D CTR.
Talkdownman is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2016, 18:23
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lestah
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dunno Talkdownman,

Biggin has been our destination and on mentioning that we transitted City on arrival, we were met with, what I thought, was some surprise. Same back at our home base. Perceptions I guess.
Local Variation is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2016, 19:01
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VFR transits have been driving Thames Radar controllers mad on a daily basis since London City Airport opened in 1987...
Talkdownman is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2016, 20:33
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Gone
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Late to this thread.

I had a VFR transit west abeam City on Wednesday last week in a single.
They couldn't have been more accommodating.
Jetblu is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2016, 20:47
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LCY is an airfield and Thames Radar is a radar unit based at Swanwick on the south coast!

The callsign "Heathrow Radar" is not used by those controlling Heathrow traffic.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.