Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Casual employment?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Apr 2015, 22:41
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Auckland
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Casual employment?

I've been hearing a lot about pilots looking for jobs. I wonder, though, if there is a market for casual jobs for pilots. The area I am interested in is Auckland. There used to be patches of GA activity employing/using pilots on casual basis - glider towing, parachute ops, scenic flights and such. It has all dried up. So, without too much of a sarcasm - is there still such thing as a casual engagement for the pilots?
sgenie is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2015, 08:46
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Aimlessly wandering
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HAHAHAHAHA
50 50 is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2015, 09:26
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BNE
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
contract work ?
BNEA320 is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2015, 09:43
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Auckland
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Contracts are even rarer, I reckon - apart from large companies, that can afford legal complication of the contracts.
sgenie is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2015, 21:08
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Aus
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why all the snide responses?

My operator has casual pilots, so they do exist.
skkm is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2015, 21:11
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Auckland
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And this is something I've been pondering about. Many of the aviation-related businesses complain about high costs, expenses etc - small operators may actually benefit greatly by employing casual stuff. If you only call a pilot for a flight when there is a flight requested and you pay only for the flight time leaving the rest of the expenses to the pilots (well, not something pleasing but it is a necessary evil) then the operator can greatly slash unproductive expenses. May be a bit naive but similar scheme works in other types of businesses - why can't it work in small aviation?
sgenie is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2015, 01:43
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sgenie,

I can't figure out if you are just taking the piss or think that you have re-invented the wheel.
I most small businesses already pay their pilots casual wages.

To give you an example:
Take two operators in Auckland: One pays a full time wage which is literally the minimum wage and to get the privilege you need to have 750 hours which you probably would have gotten from instructing and earning even less.

Second operators pays a day rate so if you don't fly for a week you don't get paid.

Small aviation business are struggling and pilot wages aren't the reason.
deadcut is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2015, 01:47
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New Zealand
Age: 42
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And you still have the cost of training and compliance with casuals even if they are not flying. Much better to have someone full time then you can flog them to the max of flight and duty too 😈.......
Terrorhawk81 is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2015, 01:50
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Auckland
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
deadcut: neither. Simply curious. For some reason aviation community seems to tend towards very sarcastic bunch and quite often even a simple question is taken as an insult. Mine was not. I've been watching the development of GA (at least in NZ) for a number of years and I do think now it is a well-designed and well-oiled Ponzi scheme. My question about casual employment was more a theoretical one.
sgenie is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2015, 01:55
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: these mist covered mountains are a home now for me.
Posts: 1,784
Received 29 Likes on 12 Posts
sgenie says
If you only call a pilot for a flight when there is a flight requested and you pay only for the flight time leaving the rest of the expenses to the pilots

A difficulty comes in that the pilot has spent a lot of time and money just to be hireable, and still has weekly living and yearly aviation costs. Such an 'hourly' rate would have to be high to secure a pilot to return and remain hireable.

Last edited by Runaway Gun; 20th Apr 2015 at 03:34.
Runaway Gun is online now  
Old 20th Apr 2015, 02:26
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Look mate I didn't mean to be a dick to you but GA wages are a sore point in the aviation community, hence the snide and sarcastic remarks towards you.

GA in New Zealand (bar a few companies) is a joke and the owners/operators will not look after you in terms of remuneration after you have sacrificed so much. This had lead to a vicious cycle of high pilot turn over (when Air NZ is hiring) and the situation gets worse.
deadcut is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2015, 02:32
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Auckland
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aye, and hence my comment about the Ponzi scheme. If a business can only consume that much of the resources (read pilots) what is the point in creating larger supply? Casual employment mechanism allows for the business owners to optimise their cashflow without sacrificing the range of the services. Granted, pilots here are those who suffer most financially but such model gives them at least a chance to build up their experience/time. It is not supposed to be a wage earner for the pilots, merely a tool to sustain and develop their skills. Similar to CFIs, by the way.
sgenie is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2015, 02:38
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Enroute from Dagobah to Tatooine...!
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
sgenie, there is no shortage of this working arrangement in GA - it is far from a new idea. I spent the first 5 years of my pilot career employed as a casual. At one stage I was employed casually in 3 jobs at the same time. 2 different flying jobs and a factory job in the afternoons/nights. I thought I was sure to get a full-time slot once when a full time member left and guess what? The position was replaced by two casuals. During this time all I wanted was a full-time gig somewhere and it took a long time coming...

Flying schools particularly benefit from casuals as often the instructor is only paid for their flying hours with most briefing work, upkeep of student notes (do you know how many hundred signatures are required in the CBT day VFR syllabus before you can send a student solo?), supervising of instructors and flying school operations (in the absence of CFI on weekends etc), office work, answering phones etc all being carried out unpaid. It can be depressing for a career pilot after years of working hard in this environment where they spend 2-3 times more time in unpaid work for relatively small number of hours flying and no internal employment progression on the horizon. The Grade 1 instructor casual wages might look good but when you consider how much unpaid work is required along with it, the REAL hourly rate can work out a lot worse than working at Maccas - and that's for a Grade 1!

Have worked under the daily rate too and more often than not the employer gets a very good deal under that arrangement also.

Believe me, if there is a way for a GA employer to cut costs with pilot employment it has already been tried somewhere. For a career pilot though, nothing beats a proper full-time salaried position.
Captain Nomad is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.