Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

CAAP 166-1(2) joining circuit upwind

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

CAAP 166-1(2) joining circuit upwind

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Aug 2014, 06:27
  #21 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also, nothing to say you cannot depart circuit on base causing collision risk
Substandard is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2014, 07:50
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Oztrailia
Posts: 2,994
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
At YTDN when I fly there I will always try and join downwind, if that means diverting around a bit down south outside the circuit to do it then so be it.

After all I'm only zipping around for fun and a few minutes extra doesn't matter to me.

Just don't fly over the field in YTDN especially on weekends.
ACMS is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2014, 07:53
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,586
Received 77 Likes on 45 Posts
After all I'm only zipping around for fun and a few minutes extra doesn't matter to me.
I wish!!!!
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2014, 08:03
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Oztrailia
Posts: 2,994
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
True.......I can't justify with the wife any more than 1 hour or so every couple of months private flying these days, but when I do venture out an extra few minutes diverting a bit doesn't matter much to keep away from the meat bombers...
ACMS is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2014, 08:42
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melb
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Gee it's difficult to believe that some don't consider upwind as part of a circuit for the purposes of flying at the same level as x-wind & downwind.
EG. MB Twr says join upwind Rwy 17R. Are you going to join 500ft higher whilst along the upwind position (as in over the Rwy) then let down? The Twr guys would open their Twr window & shoot you down!:-)

If yr 500ft above circuit height & joining parallel to upwind on the dead side of the circuit then that's a diff story but it's not called joining upwind unless you are already at circuit height.
Saw some pretty dumb things over the years at CTAF's in the old Beech, had to have several sets of eyes peeled for the 'Farmer Browns' out there who had no idea!:-)


Wmk2
Wally Mk2 is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2014, 09:37
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: rangaville
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Get another wife
Jack Ranga is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2014, 09:39
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: rangaville
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not another additional one (like in Utah), that'd be stupid. Just a different one.
Jack Ranga is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2014, 09:43
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melb
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Do what smart men/pilots do, get rid of them all ! Planes & females don't mix remember! I mean we have an industry full of divorced pilots, what does that tell ya?

Wmk2
Wally Mk2 is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2014, 09:47
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: rangaville
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And this thread is reaaaally awesome too
Jack Ranga is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2014, 10:50
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Oztrailia
Posts: 2,994
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Mmmmmmm, get rid ahhhhhhh leave the first wife and I'd have even less dosh to splash on private flying.........better stick with what I've got
ACMS is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2014, 11:36
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Use a radio, be very situational aware and get along with everyone in circuit.

Get into Birdsville on race weekend with all types of aircraft will get it sorted

Fly a PA31 into there [ not that it is a very fast a/c in circuit ] but when your against a flock of brumbies, a PC12, a couple of helis, a heap C172's with flight school students from everywhere with very "limited" english, and those who forgot to read the AIP SUP it can be busy

Again - "use radio , be very situational aware and get along with everyone in circuit !!!!!"

Last edited by Adsie; 18th Aug 2014 at 11:53.
Adsie is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2014, 14:27
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: nowhere
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Adsie,

Thanks for mentioning RADIO, where is it best to fit the 5 calls in for the average circuit?
ANCPER is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2014, 03:12
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ANCPER

I have been with a few instructors and all have a different view on what should be said or not said.

I personally give calls for 10 NM inbound with circuit joining time, anticipated RWY, overhead field, joining downwind, turning base and on finals. And then back tracking or clear of runway call.

Call sign, type and whether IFR / VFR on initial contact to CTAF, then just call sign after that.

Again traffic will dictate what your actions are. But like I said before " get along with everyone"

I find manners do go a long way - I think it is all part of airmanship.

While we are on this subject, I had a check pilot tear me a new a*se because I gave a "rolling" call on take off.

Been unable to find in the AIP if it is required or not.

Thanks in advance

PS: I still give a rolling call, just in case someone is around
Adsie is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2014, 03:17
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
rmcdonal

Are you saying that you fly direct to the FAF on an RNAV approach without going through the IAF and IF ?
Adsie is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2014, 03:45
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: nowhere
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Adsie

I was just joking on that as that subject on radio calls in general will run for 100 pages, agree with the rolling call.

Though in general too much unnecessary talking takes place clogging up the freq.
ANCPER is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2014, 06:01
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melb
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'Adsie' I think you'll find that 'rmc' was ref to the FAF as a tracking point for a straight in under visual conditions. handy/easy for accurate Rwy alignment


Wmk2
Wally Mk2 is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2014, 07:00
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Melbourne
Age: 60
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are you saying that you fly direct to the FAF on an RNAV approach without going through the IAF and IF ?
CAVOK day, why not?

DIVOSH!
Di_Vosh is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2014, 10:17
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Di_Vosh

CAVOK - fair enough but you are doing a 5 mile straight approach so you will have to give all relevant calls.

ANCPER

Sorry - missed that one about radio calls.
Yes a lot of unnecessary calls do block up freq.

And thanks for agreement with rolling call
Adsie is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2014, 11:05
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Melbourne
Age: 60
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ADSIE

My comment was made re: your questioning about tracking to the FAF without going through the IAF and IF, not about making radio calls.

DIVOSH!
Di_Vosh is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2014, 11:39
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Di_Vosh

And I replied that in VMC that approaching through the FAF was fair enough, I just added that the 5 mile final calls are required.

Just agreeing with you and adding comment
Adsie is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.