Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Space Flight and Operations
Reload this Page >

Balloon safety! Should they be certified?

Wikiposts
Search
Space Flight and Operations News and Issues Following Space Flight, Testing, Operations and Professional Development

Balloon safety! Should they be certified?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th May 2014, 21:57
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Smaller Antipode
Age: 89
Posts: 31
Received 17 Likes on 10 Posts
Does NZ not require a commercial pilots license
NZ has a CPL ( Balloon ) for which a minimum of 50 hours experience is required.

I assume that the same rules as to Hire and Reward, when carrying passengers who have paid for the ride, apply as for any other "aircraft".

Or you could just turn the tank off prior to wire contact (like you are supposed to do)
In a fixed wing aircraft one is also "supposed" to follow prescribed actions in the event of an engine failure, too, like turning off the fuel, issuing a "Mayday" call, changing the transponder code, flying at the best glide speed, picking a field etc.etc. Yeah! Right! I was recently passenger in a microlight that suffered an engine failure and we had time to do NONE of that, just get the bugger down and keep it in one piece - which the pilot did successfully I'm happy to say !

How long did the NZ balloon pilot have to plan his contact with the wires, turn off the tank, blah blah blah ??
ExSp33db1rd is offline  
Old 15th May 2014, 22:14
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wellington,NZ
Age: 66
Posts: 1,677
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by ExSp33db1rd
.........

How long did the NZ balloon pilot have to plan his contact with the wires, turn off the tank, blah blah blah ??
Here is the accident summary. (Link to download full report on that page.)

Turning off the gas at the cylinder/s wouldn't have made much difference in this case; electrical arcing ruptured one of them.

Hence my thought a few posts above to have some kind of guard fitted.

None of which can guarantee safety if a pilot carelessly or deliberately places his vehicle in harms way, of course.
Tarq57 is offline  
Old 15th May 2014, 22:49
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,408
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
I've been a DER for over 25 years (FAA, and EASA since it was formed). I've seen volumes of new regulations, interpretations, Advisory Circulars, etc. over that time. Without exception, they have added to the time, cost, and manpower required to certify an aircraft or aircraft change.

Maybe 5% have had any effect on safety, and not all were for the better. In fact the greater the safety improvement a change will provide, the longer it takes and the harder it is to certify

Adding new regulations is almost never the answer.
BTW, I don't think it makes much difference what sort of flying machine you're on, if you hit power lines your chance of having a good day are not in your favor
tdracer is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2014, 14:59
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Dorset, UK
Age: 65
Posts: 360
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post
I'm asking if they are safe enough for 21st century aviation.
If they were safe enough in 1999 they are safe enough in 2014.
Romeo Tango is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.