Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Could the Boom Overture have a Military Application?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Could the Boom Overture have a Military Application?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Mar 2024, 02:40
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Oz
Posts: 903
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Could the Boom Overture have a Military Application?

There is a long history of civilian aircraft being adapted to military roles. P8 Poseidon, Wedgetail AWACS, A330 MRT, KC10, KC767 etc etc

Could the Boom Ovature with it's M1.7 cruise speed and fairly long range work as a missile truck. The P8 has 2 x internal weapons bays. The Ovature could have a similar arangement to carry 30 or so long range cruise missles. Sort of like a low cost B1 sucessor.

Thoughts anyone?

nomorecatering is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2024, 08:09
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Eastern Cape, South Africa
Posts: 138
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
It will not get built, so no...
ATSA1 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 18th Mar 2024, 08:39
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glorious Devon
Posts: 2,693
Received 900 Likes on 525 Posts
Surely they still have the same issues as Concorde had? Noise and the boom. Calling your company Boom rather draws attention to it. As to military applications, would it be stealthy enough?

Last edited by T28B; 18th Mar 2024 at 12:47. Reason: title got fixed
Ninthace is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2024, 11:28
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: aus
Posts: 1,315
Likes: 0
Received 111 Likes on 69 Posts
Originally Posted by Ninthace
Surely they still have the same issues as Concorde had? Noise and the boom. Calling your company Boom rather draws attention to it. As to military applications, would it be stealthy enough? It’s Boom Overture by the way

Firstly they are using the Nasa research on quiet sonic booms, also FAA are looking at changes to sonic boom moratorium and general noise conditions to make these style aircraft more practical as part of the concept has them as more fuel efficient than current jets
rattman is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2024, 12:34
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 771
Received 558 Likes on 203 Posts
Originally Posted by nomorecatering
There is a long history of civilian aircraft being adapted to military roles. P8 Poseidon, Wedgetail AWACS, A330 MRT, KC10, KC767 etc etc
Could the Boom Ovature with it's M1.7 cruise speed and fairly long range work as a missile truck. The P8 has 2 x internal weapons bays. The Ovature could have a similar arangement to carry 30 or so long range cruise missles. Sort of like a low cost B1 sucessor.
Thoughts anyone?
My thoughts are it's pretty depressing that on seeing a proposed new civilian airliner your first reaction is to ask how we can use it for war.
Video Mixdown is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2024, 12:49
  #6 (permalink)  
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: The Gulf Coast
Posts: 1,709
Received 287 Likes on 130 Posts
Originally Posted by Video Mixdown
My thoughts are it's pretty depressing that on seeing a proposed new civilian airliner your first reaction is to ask how we can use it for war.
Did you notice that this is the Military Aviation forum?
T28B is offline  
The following 5 users liked this post by T28B:
Old 18th Mar 2024, 12:54
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: UK
Posts: 100
Received 48 Likes on 27 Posts
They are not only building their own supersonic airliner, but the engines as well.

I can't help but think that if there were real money to be made in this market Airbus or Boeing would be developing such a thing.

How many supersonic aircraft are there with "podded" engines? Never mind ones without reheat. I can think of a few from the 1950s, and that's about it.
Ohrly is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 18th Mar 2024, 13:41
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 2,132
Received 173 Likes on 89 Posts
Originally Posted by Ninthace
Surely they still have the same issues as Concorde had? Noise and the boom. Calling your company Boom rather draws attention to it. As to military applications, would it be stealthy enough?
The whole point of the Boom project is to fix those problems that Concorde had.
melmothtw is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2024, 15:02
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glorious Devon
Posts: 2,693
Received 900 Likes on 525 Posts
Not sure how an aerodynamic look alike will do that - but one lives in hope. It reminds me of an enlarged B-58 Hustler
Ninthace is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2024, 18:28
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,413
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
Hard to see how - given that drag increases as velocity squared - they can make an SST that has seat-mile fuel burn competitive with subsonic while going twice as fast. Mach 1.7 is too slow for any of the high efficiency 'exotic' jet engine philosophies to work (e.g. RAM/SCRAM jets), so unless there is some huge revolution in propulsion, they're still looking at low bypass turbofans...
tdracer is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2024, 18:28
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Itinerant
Posts: 828
Received 77 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by rattman
the concept has them as more fuel efficient than current jets
Nope. Even the company (BOOM) says that's not the case. BOOM says the aircraft will not be as fuel efficient as current subsonic aircraft and "must use sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) and/or purchase high-quality carbon removal credits" to reduce the environmental impact. Check the current and predicted state of SAF.
And those civilian aircraft mentioned as examples in the initial post were all derivatives of proven airframes. If the Overture is built, and is operated by enough carriers for long enough, then we could reasonably discuss possible military uses. If you like the looks of this aircraft, buy a scale model and admire it on your desk. I'd wager that will be the only reminder a decade from now.

Last edited by grizzled; 18th Mar 2024 at 18:39.
grizzled is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2024, 19:33
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: In the Pusta
Posts: 35
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If (very big if) this thing ever gets to being a certified airliner it is because DOD would have paid for it.
Not sure what value they would see in it (not saying it is not interesting but the cost will be astronomic).
So yes if it becomes reality there will be military use.
magyar_flyer is online now  
Old 18th Mar 2024, 20:57
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,201
Received 401 Likes on 248 Posts
Just out of curiosity, will that be Mach 1.7 "in a dive" or in straight and level flight? (One would hope the latter ...)
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2024, 21:27
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 771
Received 558 Likes on 203 Posts
Originally Posted by magyar_flyer
If (very big if) this thing ever gets to being a certified airliner it is because DOD would have paid for it.
Not sure what value they would see in it (not saying it is not interesting but the cost will be astronomic).
So yes if it becomes reality there will be military use.
Why would anyone pay an astronomical cost to develop such an aircraft, then pay as much again to convert it for some unspecified military role? Are there not enough proper (and also astronomically expensive) military aircraft projects already on the books?
Video Mixdown is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 18th Mar 2024, 21:35
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 275
Received 205 Likes on 108 Posts
Originally Posted by Lonewolf_50
Just out of curiosity, will that be Mach 1.7 "in a dive" or in straight and level flight? (One would hope the latter ...)
Mach 1.7? Why bother...


artee is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 19th Mar 2024, 03:17
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 163
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
There was an excellent Aviation Week “Check Six” podcast about a year ago discussing the numerous challenges this project faces. The panel also had quite a bit to say (not in a good way) of how this aircraft is being marketed. Worth the listen.
Commander Taco is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2024, 08:46
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: glasgow
Posts: 297
Received 29 Likes on 16 Posts
Meanwhile, back on planet earth……
falcon900 is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2024, 09:20
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,708
Received 37 Likes on 23 Posts
Military applications for a large supersonic transport aircraft - rapid transport for SF teams in crisis situations?
Davef68 is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2024, 10:40
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Central UK
Posts: 1,630
Received 135 Likes on 64 Posts
​​​​purchase high-quality carbon removal credits​​​
The catholic Church ran a nice little scam just like that for hundreds of years - paying to 'remove' sins...
Didn't prevent the sins from happening in the first place though, nor did it ameliorate their after-effects. It just made the scammers very very rich and the sinners passed themselves off publicly as pious, virtuous and forgiven. Ha!

rien plus ça change!
meleagertoo is offline  
The following 9 users liked this post by meleagertoo:
Old 23rd Mar 2024, 21:44
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: with the other ex-CX pond scum (a zoologist was once head of Flight Ops)
Posts: 1,852
Received 51 Likes on 22 Posts
'Boom' demonstrator has flown, with the military interested. They must have read Davef68's post!

https://www.twz.com/air/booms-xb-1-s...s-to-the-skies
Captain Dart is online now  
The following 2 users liked this post by Captain Dart:


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.