Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Civilian repatriation to Brize

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Civilian repatriation to Brize

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Jul 2015, 20:19
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Lincolnshire UK
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Excellent post Wander00; entirely appropriate.
AirportsEd is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2015, 20:32
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wander00, I couldn't have put it better.

Without wanting to politicise this, the deaths of these people was a direct result of our involvement in the Middle East and giving the victims a full, military repatriation ceremony was the least we, as a country, could do.

An outstanding effort from all those involved at Brize.
JointShiteFighter is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 06:22
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 1,075
Received 17 Likes on 7 Posts
Hmmmm...I wonder who may come off better in the forthcoming SDSR?

Large fleets of heavy tanks and bridge laying eqpt vs Typhoons and GR4s with an extended OSD and tons of PGMs...

My my, Strike Command must be rubbing their hands with glee!

(also, I tip my hat to the RAF PR machine: the top 2 news items yesterday featured a C17 (Tunisia) and a GR4 (Aki))
Training Risky is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 08:57
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South East of Penge
Age: 74
Posts: 1,792
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
I was at Luqa in 1969 when a Greek C-47 came in to repatriate a Greek Officer who had died in post.
I confess I felt a bit awkward standing at the salute as the coffin approached the open door, being bounced along on the prongs of a fork lift truck.
The dead deserve as much dignity as is possible and this was given by the RAF.
Haraka is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 09:01
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
I hope a little thread drift will be permitted, but as the Queens Colour Squadron has had a mention or two on this thread it may be of interest to anyone in London over the next few days that QCS will be mounting guard at Buckingham Palace on the 4th, 6th, 8th, 9th and 10th of July. Except on the first date the Band of the RAF Regiment will be in attendance for the Changing of the Guard ceremony.
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 09:09
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Good luck to them. Regret I cannot get there to watch as I will not be in UK until 10th. Hat doffed
Wander00 is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 09:09
  #27 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Botswana & Greece
Age: 68
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK all points taken and accepted. And, yes air pig I know. Exascot backing down - rare!

One point however HRH The Princess of Wales came back in the hold of an aircraft. Before anyone says she was not HRH at that point, I know but in my mind she was.
Exascot is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 09:20
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: england
Posts: 860
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
(Pulling pin and counting to 3)
Could it not be argued that the Brit civilian is almost taking the same risks as a serviceman nowadays in this era of asymmetric warfare? Don't they deserve a similar respect when repatriated? After all, these guys were innocently minding their own business, and not overseas looking to do harm to HMG's latest bogeymen.
If one wanted to be cynical, it's almost like HMG want the UK to be on a semi permanent terror alert to be able to control the population.
hunterboy is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 10:09
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,916
Received 2,839 Likes on 1,212 Posts
One point however HRH The Princess of Wales came back in the hold of an aircraft. Before anyone says she was not HRH at that point, I know but in my mind she was.
The VC10 fit though was not a run of the mill, shove it in and strap it down..

I much prefer seeing ordinary members of the public treated this way than some so called VIP simply because their job was in the public eye. After all it is their Air Force as much as the next man or womens, no matter their rank or stature.
NutLoose is online now  
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 10:36
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Exascot - but when Diana came back the "system" was fortunately not as well practised as it sadly has become. Furthermore, I suspect there were members of the Royal family who at that time would have done anything to ensure as little publicity and recognition as possible. In the following days, Joe Public showed how wrong they were (and in case you had not guessed, I have always been a huge supporter of "lady Di".) A book well worth a read, to digress, is "The Duchess",the biography of Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire, one of Diana's ancestors. The comparisons are quite surprising.
Wander00 is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 11:48
  #31 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Botswana & Greece
Age: 68
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NutLoose, Not that it is relevant but it was a Queen's Flight BA146, one would be pushed to get a VC10 into NHT. For the record they parked discreetly out of view to turn the coffin in the hold before coming onto the apron so that they could bring her out head first. Mrs Exascot was the duty local controller on that sad day.
Exascot is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 11:55
  #32 (permalink)  

Gentleman Aviator
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Teetering Towers - somewhere in the Shires
Age: 74
Posts: 3,697
Received 50 Likes on 24 Posts
And in the Diana case, the plan had then (fortuitously) only recently been rewritten, although with the Queen Mum in mind......

ISTR the plan names were all bridges for some reason.
teeteringhead is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 12:00
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,916
Received 2,839 Likes on 1,212 Posts
Thanks Exascot, the only one we really dealt with during my time on the Ten was the Dutchess of Windsor.
It was a sad day and agreed still HRH in these eyes too, I could never undertand how you could strip that title from the mother of the future King.
NutLoose is online now  
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 13:23
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Purely personally (and I can almost hear the black Omegas revving up) IMHO it was a bl@@dy cheek to deprive Diana of HRH status, given the behaviour of the other party, which after all (allegedly)was the root cause of the divorce (But let's not go there)

Last edited by Wander00; 3rd Jul 2015 at 13:25. Reason: To stop this SB guy beating me with his truncheon!
Wander00 is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 13:52
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Far North of Watford
Age: 82
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The sainted Diana became HRH on account of her marriage to a Prince. When she was no longer married to a Prince she was no longer entitled to it. Same with Fergie. And there was fault on both sides, as is the case in most broken marriages. Get over it.
Genstabler is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 14:34
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Whoooops!!
Wander00 is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 14:58
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: N. Spain
Age: 79
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
(Pulling pin and counting to 3)
Could it not be argued that the Brit civilian is almost taking the same risks as a serviceman nowadays in this era of asymmetric warfare? Don't they deserve a similar respect when repatriated? After all, these guys were innocently minding their own business, and not overseas looking to do harm to HMG's latest bogeymen. If one wanted to be cynical, it's almost like HMG want the UK to be on a semi permanent terror alert to be able to control the population.
No pin, just a request to explain how you can equate a holidaymaker with a serviceman/woman, on a duty tour in harms way, for us civilians?
I have no objection whatsoever with these victims of this atrocity being repatriated and met with dignity by the RAF.
Shack37 is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 15:03
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My tuppenceworth:
The whole thing is largely a statement of political will.
Whether or not one agrees with, e.g., the minute's silence, that is, IMHO, what it's all about.
Basil is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 18:20
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Civ/HAL/SHY/FYY/PWK/AAS/WAD/AVI/GPT/BZN/BSN/WAD/BAS/FLK/WIT/MND/WAD/WIT/WAD/Civ
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't help but think, why not save them all up and do 1 later repat to UK and save the fuel?
A C17 can easily take 30 coffins + associated handing pax

The only reasons I can think of - there aren't enough undertakers/hearses/morgue space in Oxon (to deal with additional load over & above natural death rate) or speed of ID-ing victims in Tunisia.

Last edited by unclenelli; 3rd Jul 2015 at 18:32.
unclenelli is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 19:39
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Wiltshire
Age: 71
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There's no reason why the AT fleet, in the guise of the C17 operators can't do this repatriation, and, I take issue with those who misguidedly believe that the repatriated bodies are being given "full military honours". The reception party at BZN provided by QCS is respectful and in accordance with the standard respects shown by a serviceman to any funeral cortège. I do agree that the C17 is capable of repatriating all of the victims in one run, rather than 3 or so. I rather suspect that the delay is down to political direction, rather than RAF planning. I have also read that all costs incurred by the RAF in this operation, will be recompensed by the tour operator who provided the holidays. Finally, I think of the seriously injured people who were the first evacuees returned by C17, a team unfortunately highly capable of transporting casualties of gunshot wounds, to a hospital well used to helping them. It all reflects on the RAF very well, spreading the load over 3 days smacks of certain politico's trying to "drag out" their exposure to the media. I hark back to one incident that set a precedent for me. I was serving at Akrotiri when the Turks invaded in the early 70s. Newly married my wife was evacuated back to UK on a VC10, two weeks after we were called on to base. I well remember seeing the families club, stuffed with British passport holders, as we were required to sit for 4 hours with no water or food in a very hot climate. The holidaymakers and Nationals with British nationality were given first priority on flights returning to UK, our wives and families had to wait. I'm sure many will remember it, I'm sure anyone who served during that time will accept that sometimes, the non combatants should have the priority, the RAF does after all belong to the British public.

Smudge
smujsmith is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.