Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

New Royal Navy combat number 4 uniform.

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

New Royal Navy combat number 4 uniform.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Jan 2015, 16:54
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Location: Location!
Posts: 2,302
Received 35 Likes on 27 Posts
Looks like Little F (in both cases) is wearing..... shock horror! ..... a baseball cap.

Incidentally, it should be recalled that any uniform changes such as those at issue have to be approved personally by HM The Queen.

Jack
Union Jack is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2015, 19:19
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,709
Received 38 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by Naffenea
Velcro instead of buttons is a bad idea.
I am imagining one of HM's big booming submarines running silent when the Capt decides to take something out his pocket...
Davef68 is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2015, 20:45
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought the uniforms were cotton to stop them welding to the skin in a flash fire
Nutty, cotton ain't much good in a fire either. If you don't do nomex then the best stuff is wool.
thing is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2015, 21:05
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,048
Received 2,920 Likes on 1,249 Posts
Damn sight better better than nylon though.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2015, 21:05
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Road to Nowhere
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Silent Velcro?

The Military Has Silent Velcro!
See here

I believe there are other versions.

I must get out much more.

STH
SirToppamHat is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2015, 21:10
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Damn sight better better than nylon though.
Indeed but you would be amazed at the amount of pilot clothing suppliers that sell 'Tornado/top gun/hot shots' bomber jackets in 'rip stop fashioned nylon.' Makes me seeth. No one should wear plastic as flight gear. Utter madness.
thing is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2015, 16:34
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,048
Received 2,920 Likes on 1,249 Posts
There is a way to get around the Velcro noise issue

NutLoose is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2015, 19:21
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not caps, but nylon vs 'good' aircrew flight gear. Original aircrew watch I was issued early 70's had a woven canvas strap. nice and safe. Watch went U/S about 2 years later, stores replacement aircrew watch had a nylon strap! with a leather section that threaded through the strap, so the metal watch and clasp didn't touch the skin, but most of the nylon strap did! HMG got the watch back when I left, but I still have the strap somewhere (I think).
bike2lv is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2015, 02:57
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up Better than 4s and works really well

I was part of the 7 month trial in 2012 on board HMS DARING. I have to say the new uniform is excellent both in the heat and humidity of the gulf and also the more temperate climate of the north atlantic.

The only velcro IIRC was to attach name badges and crests rather like the new PCS, which this new uniform closely resembles.

The baseball caps were only worn whilst at sea (RAS etc), not alongside when a traditional cap or beret was correctly deemed more appropriate.

Overall a vast improvement; practicable, versatile, comfortable and smart.

FNS
flynavysomerset is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2015, 06:42
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think it looks ok - utilitarian, functional and comfortable. Let's face it, naval rig at sea has always looked unwieldy, how would bell bottoms, flares and nylon trousers have coped with the PPRuNe microscope of the 60s, 70s and 80s? My concern would be that it looks like it'll get tatty quickly (it doesn't look particularly rugged) and the baseball hats give the bean counters something to flog. But hey, how many Red Arrow flying suits for the fighter aces of tomorrow are there out there? All good fun.
Al R is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2015, 11:45
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Hangarshuffle

I think this stuff is just about probably an improvement on the uniform from the past in a practical sense..
In my time I would have liked to have seen:
A slip on, heavy duty boot with thick sole and steel cap. Possibly like a rigger boot.
A proper Winter coat with a big hood, made to keep you warm instead of the crap thin plastic anoraks we had.
A thicker warmer pullover.
A strong practical smock.
A fleece. Some long sleeved tops, casual (bit like a noggy top of old).
Proper blue strong combat trousers with bigger deeper securable thigh pockets for keeping anything from the duty SPO keys to an SA80 magazine to a small radio.
Think they should have brought out a suitable soft cap rather than a baseball cap.
All this based on my own hard luck experience.
Hope these items are now in for the current lads and lasses, but I doubt it. It seems too hard to grasp.
CS95 (i.e. something that was issued 20 years ago) had a fleece. Very thick, long elastic cuffs. The outer shell jacket was ripstop, and reasonably windproof. With that on top and the fleece underneath, you would be very warm indeed. Can't speak for RAF V-neck pullovers, I never wore one; but the crew-neck Army version was plenty warm. You would overheat if you had your JHW on under the fleece. There was a very close-knit version of it issued for a while, but that was withdrawn and we went back to the old pattern. CS95 combat trousers had pretty good pockets, exactly as you say, keep magazines in there. Though I found them better for beer. You could get 2x cans in each thigh pocket. Two more in the vertically-zipped chest pockets in the smock and you're good to go.

Although lace-up, the combat assault boots that were issued with CS95 were also very comfortable, warm and had good grip. Berets were warm in their own right, but if things got really cold or dirty, there was always the headover cap; that was simple and effective.

The only problem with the fleece was you couldn't wear it as the outer layer as it was camouflaged and had no rank tabs. Thus the SSM would be heard screaming "No fooking teddy bears!"

There's always the arctic kit too if it's that cold. I got issued that gear for Bosnia in winter, and the "Deputy-Dawg" hat was so warm that you'd have to take it off within an hour. The parka was OK, in reality the CS95 layered approach was better. With thermal long john top & bottoms, CS95 pants and Norwegian shirt (issued with CS95), fleece, CS95 smock and Goretex waterproofs if required, there really was no issue in the -25C temps on Mount Igman.

I thought CS95 was very good, and certainly a vast improvement over the utter garbage that preceded it. The 68 pattern combat jacket was good until it got wet, but that's about it.
Roadster280 is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2015, 19:55
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lancashire
Age: 48
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't see what's wrong with making them wear flares again combined with Velcro, I loved my 70's nights.
Thelma Viaduct is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2015, 11:59
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think the baseball cap is thoroughly impractical.
If you want to look up at, e.g., an instrument, bareheaded or wearing a beret, a flick of the eyes will suffice. Wearing the street dude hat you have to tilt right back.
Bas, never wore headgear in ships engine rooms or transport aircraft.
Basil is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2015, 12:56
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Around
Posts: 1,203
Received 117 Likes on 53 Posts
The MTP baseball caps were very de-regeur with the "special" Avn elements in KAF last year....
downsizer is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2015, 13:24
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: In a world of my own.
Posts: 380
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Looking up.

To look you have to wear them backwards or sideways. That a real cool dude! (So I am informed by the younger generation).


Aaron.
AARON O'DICKYDIDO is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2015, 15:39
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,819
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
Or 'kewl' in yoof-speak, Aaron.

Being now 'somdel stape in age*', driving one's teutonic tourer on sunny days either means acquiring sunglasses with corrective lenses (at £ lots), or using a 'baseball' cap with ordinary spectacles...

...which is OK provided no-one recognises me!




*for grammar school oiks, that's a Chaucerian phrase meaning 'an old fart'!
BEagle is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2015, 15:43
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,048
Received 2,920 Likes on 1,249 Posts
Get one of these Beags, held on by static

http://www.transair.co.uk/sp+Large-S...Sun-Visor+6880
NutLoose is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2015, 16:48
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Sussex UK
Age: 66
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You were obviously wearing contacts that day then BEagle



CoffmanStarter is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2015, 16:54
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by BEagle
Or 'kewl' in yoof-speak, Aaron.

Being now 'somdel stape in age*', driving one's teutonic tourer on sunny days either means acquiring sunglasses with corrective lenses (at £ lots), or using a 'baseball' cap with ordinary spectacles...

...which is OK provided no-one recognises me!




*for grammar school oiks, that's a Chaucerian phrase meaning 'an old fart'!
Grammar school oik I may be, but at least I had the good sense to get an SL rather than the Kurz, and its consequently miniature windscreen. The sun visors worked quite well in the SL. In the R107 incarnation, the windscreen was so engineered as to be a fully functional rollover bar, and hence massive!
Roadster280 is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2015, 17:09
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,048
Received 2,920 Likes on 1,249 Posts
Blimey, a Kleines Kettenkrad
NutLoose is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.