Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Future Carrier (Including Costs)

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Future Carrier (Including Costs)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Sep 2014, 10:18
  #3621 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just a thought, but by the time carrier 2 is operational, won't Typhoon be close to its out of service date? That would leave us with 48 JSF only......
27mm is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2014, 11:28
  #3622 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tranche 1 should all be gone by ~2020, the rest by 2030(+?).

One assumes BAES et al are hard at work on a replacement (with or without a person on board to feed the dog...)
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2014, 11:33
  #3623 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...and to operate the landing gear.
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 14:09
  #3624 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Holly Beach, Louisiana
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps there is a cheaper alternative to the Carriers. It might take a bit of fiddling about but then that would be very British would it not?

Some high speed Tugs....some sleek barges.....



Boudreaux Bob is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 15:05
  #3625 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 327
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Probably foolhardy to attempt a straight bat reply amid the banter, but hey. The 48 have always been described as an initial uptake linked with the carriers, with further orders envisaged later but in the context of Typhoon OSD. So it does seem that we're looking at just 7 front line FJ sqns once Tornado is retired, with 5 Typhoon and 2 F35 units covering everything including Tornado replacement. Who'd have thought...
Frostchamber is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 15:18
  #3626 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
"Lack of numbers has a weakness all of its own"

OAP
Onceapilot is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2014, 17:35
  #3627 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,708
Received 37 Likes on 23 Posts


Although I do wonder how the pilot is going to climb on board! :-)
Davef68 is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2014, 12:16
  #3628 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,400
Received 1,589 Likes on 726 Posts
AW&ST: Saab Gets A Toe In The Water

Two Swedish delegations have recently visited the Brazilian aircraft carrier Sao Paulo in support of plans to develop a naval version of the JAS 39E/F Gripen fighter. A government team toured the ship in August, followed by a Saab-Embraer technical/engineering group in September.

Informally known as the Gripen M (Maritime or Marinha), the carrier-based version has been under study in parallel with the E/F since the program's early years. In 2013, in the run-up to Brazil's selection of the JAS 39E/F as its next fighter (with a contract due at year-end), Saab said that its company-funded study had brought the Gripen M to the point where it could be offered as a fixed-price development program, costing $250 million and taking five years from launch to production deliveries.

Saab and Brazil have already agreed that Embraer will lead the development of the two-seat JAS 39F, subject to the final contract, and development of the Gripen M could broaden that partnership. Ownership of an operational aircraft carrier is clearly a prerequisite for a Gripen M partner, and both India and Brazil have been approached.

Brazil's Sao Paulo carrier, formerly the French navy's Foch, has taken a long time to upgrade and restore to operational condition, but the Brazilian navy has persisted both with the ship and its current air wing, including a major upgrade of its AF-1 Skyhawk fighters with a new Elta radar and glass cockpit. One report suggests that Brazil expects the ship and its air wing to be operational in time to support security for the 2016 Olympic games in Rio de Janeiro.
ORAC is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2014, 17:04
  #3629 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: UK
Age: 40
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unless the MoD enjoys expensive sounding splashes a few feet in front of the carrier I'm not sure of the relevancy of the Gripen. Nice looking aircraft though.
Whitewhale83 is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2014, 20:10
  #3630 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Well, yes, the MoD did rather foreclose that option.
LowObservable is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2014, 11:31
  #3631 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,923
Received 2,844 Likes on 1,215 Posts
Meanwhile over the pond, running over budget on a fixed contract price cap.... No probelm, accept it into the Navy incomplete, then chuck extra money at it to finish it.... One hopes BAe do not cotton on to that idea.

GAO: Navy carrier will be incomplete, cost more at delivery - Pacific - Stripes

YOKOSUKA NAVAL BASE, Japan — The Navy plans to meet the $12.9 billion cost cap for its new aircraft carrier by accepting the ship unfinished and spending more money afterward, according to a report by the government’s watchdog agency.
The aircraft carrier Gerald R. Ford may be unable to demonstrate its promise to boost aircraft launch and recovery rates before it is delivered to the Navy, according to a Government Accountability Office report released Thursday.
The ship may also require as much as $988 million more in spending after delivery, according to the GAO.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2014, 15:11
  #3632 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well when you have another 9-10 in service it really doesn't matter

I was rather surprised that the second CVN21 is to be named JFK........ surely "Richard Milhouse Nixon" is overdue.

Carter has an SSN, no-one can name a boat after W J Clinton when his Mrs is still in politics and you can't really have two Bush's around at the same time....................
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2014, 22:35
  #3633 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At least there's another Enterprise on the way. Sadly not NCC-1701 though...
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2014, 23:02
  #3634 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,923
Received 2,844 Likes on 1,215 Posts
I was rather surprised that the second CVN21 is to be named JFK........ surely "Richard Milhouse Nixon" is overdue.
Do you think they ever will after his inpeachment?

Though if they did, they could rename all the sea c*cks on board, Watergates
NutLoose is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2014, 03:52
  #3635 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 75
Posts: 2,579
Likes: 0
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts
STEVE GEORGE in March 2014 Talks about F-35Bs and CVFs with F-35Cs thrown in....

A mixture of F-35 topics in this audio interview however the F-35B and CVF are mentioned most so it'll go here.

Sea Control 28 (East Atlantic) – The F-35 March 2014 By LT Matthew Hipple speaking to STEVE GEORGE
"For the inaugural edition of Sea Control’s “East Atlantic” series, Alexander Clarke brings on Steve George, former engineer with the F-35 program and Royal Navy veteran to discuss the challenges and misconceptions of the F-35 program."
AUDIO: http://cimsec.org/wp-content/uploads...antic-F-35.mp3 (28Mb)

Source: USNI Blog » Blog Archive » Sea Control 28 (East Atlantic) ? The F-35
SpazSinbad is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2014, 09:01
  #3636 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Though if they did, they could rename all the sea c*cks on board, Watergates"
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2014, 11:16
  #3637 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
I enjoyed the joke if no one else did.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2014, 13:06
  #3638 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do you think they ever will after his inpeachment?
Technically he wasn't impeached. Although he almost certainly would have been had he not quit.

I dare say Clinton(s) will get something, perhaps a clittoral combat ship for the wife, a frigate for him?

Last edited by Willard Whyte; 23rd Nov 2014 at 13:17.
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2014, 14:27
  #3639 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CVX-21 "Hilary Clinton"

Fleet tug "W J Clinton"
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2014, 15:26
  #3640 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney
Age: 45
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They could go back to traditional carrier names such as Saratoga, Hornet and Lexington etc. Better than naming them after politicians.
dat581 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.