Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

I.E.D's A solution ?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

I.E.D's A solution ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Feb 2010, 17:56
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post
I often wondered as a lot of the explosives used are "cooked" from Fertiliser, why, as they did in Ireland during the troubles, do they simply not make fertilisers with a high nitrate content illegal? there by reducing amount of potential explosive available.
I heard this discussion on CSPAN where they've banned one formula of fertilizer and substituted another, which I assume is harder to make IEDs with.

However it was also mentioned that they raided a huge warehouse full of the stuff and the assumption is there are still huge stockpiles.
FakePilot is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2010, 18:18
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tonker. You are so right. The arm forces are the FCO's option of last resort. We need to re-think our standing in the world first then complete SDR. Our position as a world banking/ finance centre has been mortally compromised and our social services and health services are bankrupting us.
Phoney Tony is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2010, 18:54
  #23 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
If you simply google mine clearance vehicles you get links such as this:

HowStuffWorks "Mine Clearing Machines"

there is even a Jane's

Jane's Mines and Mine Clearance
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2010, 18:58
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: St Annes
Age: 68
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is this an official joke thread?
Let me see, foot patrols wearing snowshoes - so the bad guy pops up, lets off a few rounds, then scoots off chortling in his Adidas flip flops while the foot patrol waddle after him... Hovercraft, flail tanks turning every road surface into a goat track, vehicles with wheels on the end of legs (you'd be able to drive that down any standard motorway sized road then - might not fit through the middle of a village though). Meanwhile GPS and Mobile phones go off the air, while Johnny Afghan wonders why his TV switches to Postman Pat whenever a landy goes past.

My guess is the next big idea will turn out to be an unintentional rip off from Thunderbirds, perhaps using the Mole?

I think I've figured out why nobody seems to be using Pprune as a think tank....
davejb is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2010, 19:23
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,289
Received 511 Likes on 213 Posts
Tonker. You are so right. The arm forces are the FCO's option of last resort. We need to re-think our standing in the world first then complete SDR. Our position as a world banking/ finance centre has been mortally compromised and our social services and health services are bankrupting us.
PT......did we annex the UK recently? Sure sounds like the situation in the US of A these days and we got three more years to put up with our guy!
SASless is online now  
Old 5th Feb 2010, 20:55
  #26 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bedford
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the input ,the flail idea was bugging me so had to put in here to get feedback as I am fed up seeing our personnel getting killed by IED's,and seeing them arrive at Lyneham in C-17's.( I am a civilian but from an RAF childhood and 1,200 hours instructing with an ATC Gliding School)
Yes we must all be careful posting on here as the nasties may be reading but amazed at the thoughtful discussion it has generated. Davejb this is not a wind up have you tried looking at the MoD website to make a suggestion ?
T-21 is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2010, 21:05
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London
Posts: 189
Received 26 Likes on 5 Posts
Surely the best way would be to eliminate the people as they plant them. A week of intense observation of an area by whatever assets we have - anyone digging a hole after dark is unlikely to be doing a bit of overtime filling in potholes for the council. After a few nights when Terry doesn't come back, there might be a shortage of volunteers to take his place.
topgas is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2010, 21:10
  #28 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bedford
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would heat detection find these devices ? i.e carry out a heat detection survey before moving troops over the area.
Regarding GPS shut down we could always revert to astro/sun navigation using the sextant.
T-21 is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2010, 21:31
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: St Annes
Age: 68
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I didn't think it was a wind up, I just had trouble believing people thought these were sensible ideas.
davejb is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2010, 21:57
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: London
Posts: 555
Received 21 Likes on 15 Posts
Some other people's "joke ideas" that resulted in the MRAPs that US and UK troops are driving around in today:

AfricanCrisis
t43562 is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2010, 22:04
  #31 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
Tonker,

How about staying at home and minding our own business!

We are a small bankrupt island off Europe, not the worlds policeman. Not even a community policeman or traffic Womble. Accepting it and moving on will probably defeat the root causes of terrorism a load more than the recruitment campaign for nutters that is Afghanistan/Iraq.
Congratulations, you definitely win the prize for the most comprehensive understanding of the "Cause and Effect" principle. Well done, however unpopular that view may be...
Two's in is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2010, 07:30
  #32 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bedford
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
t43562,
Some interesting vehicles there and this is the type of thinking required.
T-21 is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2010, 09:03
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: S of 55N
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Significant informed effort is being expended in this area

https://www.jieddo.dod.mil/index.aspx
Mine and IED Resistant Vehicles | Think Defence

Sun Who
Sun Who is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2010, 09:48
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Lincs
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Predictably, I see some pompous drivel appearing about cause and effect! So 9/11 happened because we invaded Afghanistan right? No wait...Iraq? No...hang on, er....

Back on topic....I accept that sometimes it's the crazy ideas that have merit....but seriously guys/girls, have a think through the second order consequences of some of these suggestions!

Running around in a firefight, in the desert, in snowshoes?! Hello?

Crippling the economy of the entire country by bombing the roads back to dirt tracks? Genius!

But it’s ok because we will airdrop supplies to the civilians that we isolate! Have a think about how much food you need in a month. Multiply x people in a town/village. How much airdrop capacity do you think that requires?

Have a look at a map too. Afghanistan is HUGE.

And what would you think if outsiders came and bombed your local roads...presumably on a daily basis because it would not take long to plant new IEDs in the resultant dirt tracks (and they would then be harder to spot).

We’re trying to SAVE the population of Afghanistan – not actively turn them against us!

That means that we need to stand alongside them, put our troops in harms way alongside them, and demonstrate that we are better than the Taliban (and the many other tribal groups that have crime, narcotics and corrupt control on their agenda that are lumped in with the Taliban), that we will stand by our word, that we will act fairly and honestly and that we can bring a better future to pass.

And we can. Ask the troops on the ground. To quote a young Captain I saw interviewed, ‘We do not want our public’s sympathy because sympathy is for losers – and we’re not losing. We just want their support!’

Staying this course, even with the daily horror of casualties, is more likely to succeed that retreating into our bases, becoming isolated from the population and becoming stuck in a long, drawn out conflict with even more casualties over time.

I’m with dave...a well meaning thread perhaps but comical bordering upon dangerous.

CK out.
Captain Kirk is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2010, 10:09
  #35 (permalink)  
PTT
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Predictably, I see some pompous drivel appearing about cause and effect! So 9/11 happened because we invaded Afghanistan right? No wait...Iraq? No...hang on, er....
Go back a bit further. I guess you are quite happy to build and knock down your own straw men though.
PTT is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2010, 16:49
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: on the edge of a big fall
Posts: 141
Received 9 Likes on 3 Posts
Some interesting vehicles there and this is the type of thinking required.
Are you sure you have not served, you sound like a captain from Walmington-on-Sea.
My 2 suggestions:
Hard pave all the roads, thereby making it very difficult to emplace devices.
Make all Local nationals wear Lycra, thereby making it far easier to spot suicide bombers.
Is that good thinking?
higthepig is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2010, 18:18
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: London
Posts: 555
Received 21 Likes on 15 Posts
Sometimes ideas that seem odd turn out to work, sometimes being allowed to think them without being scorned leads to other more practical ideas.

I have often been amazed at how various things I think would never work do and make the people who did them rich.

I would guess that a lot of effort is being put in to all this officially though people "on the outside" sometimes have an unusual and useful perspective. Even with 60 million people it is still possible for an individual to have unique skills or insight in Britain.

The real proof of this stuff is if you were prepared to go out in your inflatable shoes and walk over IEDs yourself. If you're prepared to put your life on the line for your own idea then perhaps people should say "good for you and good luck." From a distance. :-)

Last edited by t43562; 6th Feb 2010 at 18:36.
t43562 is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2010, 19:17
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: St Annes
Age: 68
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The real proof of this stuff is if you were prepared to go out in your inflatable shoes and walk over IEDs yourself.
Sometimes (quite often) all this proves is that the idea was bloody stupid in the first place.

It helps to remember that whilst outlandish ideas sometimes work, usually they don't - it is a common misconception that because 'daft' ideas sometimes pan out that all daft ideas have merit... if this thread were actually intended to generate good ideas for use in Afghanistan then posters might do well to remember a couple of basic 'rules' of the game -
such as

1) We are ostensibly there to support a democratic government, with the overal aim (I presume) of making the Afghan government strong enough to maintain internal security without further support.

2) We are not there to punish the locals, to strip their country of assets, or to damage the Afghan infrastructure (such as it is).

3) They are not an enemy nation that we have conquered, we aren't intentionally in there to kill everyone who looks at us funny.

Consequently good ideas shouldn't involve indiscriminate slaughter of anyone holding a spade, or turning the road network into an allotment.
davejb is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2010, 19:31
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,289
Received 511 Likes on 213 Posts
Midnight Pothole Repairs?

Dave,

Your comment.....

Consequently good ideas shouldn't involve indiscriminate slaughter of anyone holding a spade, or turning the road network into an allotment.
How many folks repair potholes in the middle of the night in Afghanistan?

Evidently you do not appreciate the length the Coalition Forces go to in confirming "hostile intent" before taking action. The mere holding of a Spade does not warrant a hostile action.....holding one while emplacing an IED does....carrying a Spade in hand as one leaves the site where one has just emplaced an IED qualifies as well.

Should it not?
SASless is online now  
Old 6th Feb 2010, 19:48
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,923
Received 2,844 Likes on 1,215 Posts
AfricanCrisis&

Well there you go DaveJB, exactly what I meant, wheels remote from the body pod and the body shaped to deflect the blast AND IT WORKS.......... Call me old fashioned, but I cannot see the logic of putting the driver directly over the wheels unless you are hoping to use the axle as extra protection,

I also cannot understand why we over complicate military vehicles these days what with fuel computers and those for the drive train...... So it may meet UK emission requirements etc, but in the field you need something that can be repaired locally using the basic of tools, I work on piston Aero Engines amongst other things that can loose a cylinder and will still run, indeed they can and have got people across the channel and to an Airport, they can have a cylinder replaced in a couple of hours with a few basic spanners..... Bar the landrover most of the new stuff appears to have lost that simplicity of repair.

The image of a column of £1,000,000 vehicles being lead down a road by a man walking with a metal detector sums up why what i suggested (and appears to have been successfully developed) is needed.

You seem to think just because we mention something then we are talking about using them in built up areas, far from it, when you see some of the paths these guys have to clear up observation hills etc the facility to simply go through all the radio frequencies to detonate one radio controlled IED and save the life of one person would make the whole idea worthwhile. Also I seem to remember the UK they were developing a localised mobile phone jammer to nullify their usage in certain buildings, but then scanning the phone frequencies with the first suggestion would be a possibility.

Last edited by NutLoose; 6th Feb 2010 at 20:08.
NutLoose is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.