18 Injured CX880 after RTO.
Patently a ******* expert. From his garret in ‘Westminster’. You have to give social media its credit. An expert sat on his shiny arse around every corner.
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: In the middle
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Have you considered that the reason the evacuation never happened in the front, was that the pilots stopped them in time, but were unable to cancel the order in the back?
I'm just spitballing here, as we don't know what happened, this is a rumour platform after all.
There are crazy Captains, there are crazy ISMs, I'm sure you've flown with many of them.
I'm just spitballing here, as we don't know what happened, this is a rumour platform after all.
There are crazy Captains, there are crazy ISMs, I'm sure you've flown with many of them.
Wow. I’m actually learning something from this thread! Great discussion.
Thanks gents, esp Jester (good food for thought, plus mature reactions I didn’t even think were allowed on the prune ) and ex Douglas Driver for the excellent reference.
At the end of the day split-second decision, no-one dead and airplane intact, well done. The Monday morning quarterbacking is inevitable in our profession, even Sully had a hard time justifying his decisions (and I for one would be happy to do half as well as he did in a situation half as difficult as he faced).
Thanks gents, esp Jester (good food for thought, plus mature reactions I didn’t even think were allowed on the prune ) and ex Douglas Driver for the excellent reference.
At the end of the day split-second decision, no-one dead and airplane intact, well done. The Monday morning quarterbacking is inevitable in our profession, even Sully had a hard time justifying his decisions (and I for one would be happy to do half as well as he did in a situation half as difficult as he faced).
It’s interesting the recommendations on that airbus safety publication hasn’t made its way to the FCTM - as we are told here to be ‘go minded’ and that ‘very few situations should lead to a reject’ above 100 knots, with speed discrepancy not specifically listed as one of them. Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for a reject due to a discrepancy (below 100 knots) but would be thinking twice about it above 100 knots if stop margin limited. This is why it’s important to scan all 3 speed indications early in the takeoff roll as alluded to in that safety publication and the FCTM. A good article by Airbus on RTO decision making here:
https://www.smartcockpit.com/docs/St...o_Decision.pdf
What’s interesting is the percentage of RTO over-run accidents between 1961-1999 that were initiated below V1.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts