Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Fragrant Harbour
Reload this Page >

Freighter Jump Seat

Wikiposts
Search
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

Freighter Jump Seat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Jun 2010, 21:41
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't get me wrong, mingle. Different groups of staff get different advantages (company car, laptop, phones...)

So why should you be complaining if we get something that might make our life easier? Because you can't have it? Come on...

Being away from home 15 days a month, I even think we should be entitled to take our wife/kids on some long freighter trips.

And actually, I don't mind having some ground staff jumpseating on a cargo airplane if they so wish.
fly123456 is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2010, 01:36
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In front of the PC
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
minglestar

Just remember, without ground staff (marketing, sales, ramp, operations), you pilots would not have employment, let alone a $200m aircraft to fly.
Are we up here cos you're down there, or are you down there cos we're up here??

Remember, it was pilots who started this business and pilots who employed clerks like yourself to take care of things when we were up there. If we decide not to come to work (and thats an entirely different discussion) you're out of a job, If you decide not to come to work, we employ another clerk.
asianeagle is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2010, 01:46
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: US
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmm, can anyone name another major carrier that won't allow pilots to JS on their own carrier? Ground staff and Cabin crew, excellent! I am happy everyone is interested in this issue, let's work together as an airline to get this very basic benefit! An easy battle to win with minimal economic impact. Who writes the ops specs? Oh yeah we do!
Knightpilot is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2010, 01:48
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the Haze
Posts: 47
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
minglestar,

Just remember, without ground staff (marketing, sales, ramp, operations), you pilots would not have employment, let alone a $200m aircraft to fly.
If one of the staff at the marketing, sales, ramp, or operations department doesn't show up for work one day, nobody would notice.

If one of the Aircrew doesn't show up to work, that flight stops and the entire operation is affected.

Don't forget it!!
Forward CofG is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2010, 03:27
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
foward cofg and asianeage:

oh plssssss..... from your posts, it suggests your knowledge of commercial airline operations are very limited, and very ignorant of other aspects that makes the whole operation works. Pilots might have pioneered commercial aviation, but nowadays pilots are just one of many parts needed for a smooth, safe, and economical operation.

Granted that flights will not need be delayed if a marketing manager fails to show up for work. But if a ground engineer fails to show up for work, the plane isn't going anywhere until it is signed-off by the licensed engineer.

Your sense of importance of the role of the pilot in the whole operation is way over-estimated. Pilots can be replaced as easily as ground engineers, ramp agents, cabin crew, marketing managers can be replaced. No one is irreplaceable. Airline operations will not ground to a halt if a few not show up for work.

Also remember, without marketing and sales, there will be no money to pay you and buy shiny new planes. Do not forget it.
minglestar is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2010, 03:40
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Yellow Brick Road
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No one is irreplaceable.
Too true. Even airlines are not indispensible - see Oasis, Viva Macau.
ReverseFlight is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2010, 06:07
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Please stop, this is embarassing.

We all have jobs to do to make money for the shareholders.
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2010, 10:28
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Retired-ville
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spanners, yes it is somewhat embarrasing, but it is also good for a laugh.
I'm on my second bucket of popcorn already.

On a realistic note, my 2c worth is that I would far prefer that operational crew, ie engineers, pilots etc who are aircraft savvy, and have had a modicum of firefighting training, or, who could provide practical help for any number of possible in flight drama recovery situations, were allowed to jumpseat on the freighter.
No sleight intended to the paper pushers, it's just that most would be more of a hindrance than a help. The probability of them having the spine, training or skillset to don the firefighting kit and play fireman, (or firechick - if one is to be pc), is I believe somewhat remote. There's a greater chance they would just freak out and be an additional problem.

Consequently, I'd rather they, and mingestar, stayed shuffling papers or took a regular passenger flight.
LongTimeInCX is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2010, 13:09
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The pointy end
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The use of freighter jumpseats AND upper deck seats frees up demand for seats on pax flight for all to use. As a result EVERYONE benefits.
At the end of the day we are talking about getting families together in times of high loadings eg Xmas/Chinese new year etc.
The jumpseat and who sits in such is the Captain's prerogative and, interestingly, it is a potential revenue stream that the company has yet to take advantage of.
Yes, for those of you trolling this site, CX makes a tidy profit from staff travel.
Rice power is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2010, 13:47
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: hongkong
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Freighter aircraft aren't equipped for passengers. We don't carry cabin crew to aid in the event of an evacuation and as such ground staff really aren't appropriate. I feel appropriately qualified personnel who are evacuation qualified could be considered. I'm afraid its a self help programme on freighter.

Nothing to do with prejudice. And great to hear so many of you wanting to come fly with us. I hope you understand. Fill your boots on the PAX fleet and enjoy the wonderful CX service and IFE.

BP
Big Picture is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2010, 01:59
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: HK
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
minglestar

Did we fail pilot training?

We are all in the team. But when it comes to giving YOU the jumpseat it is the Captain's decision. Attitude / reputation will probably come into play in that decision making process!
iceman50 is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2010, 21:38
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Crew bunk
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is against the CAD rules for carriage of non operating personnel on Hong Kong registered freighters.
Funny how the Mainland CAD doesn't have a problem with it. I know of at least one Mainland cargo carrier that allows their pilots to jumpseat on the freighter.

And why should pilots be given the additional option of getting jumpseat on freigthers over other employees of the company (for leisure travel purposes)?
Simple -- because an extra pilot in the cockpit is an asset (an extra set of eyes who can spot safety concerns). That's why we have 4 guys up front for takeoff and landing during long hauls. Anyone else is a liability or safety hazard in the cockpit. Can you understand the ATC radio transmissions enough to stop talking if you hear a call midway through your life's story? Would you be able to pickup a missed radio call and have the confidence to say "that was for us!" I didn't think so! Only pilots should be allowed in the cockpit. Most others just get in the way, or create unnecessary distractions. There is no cockpit door in the freighter, so the upper deck seats must be considered as being in the cockpit. Also, other than Cabin Crew, no one else takes the necessary yearly evacuation training.
Pogie is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2010, 06:32
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Simple -- because an extra pilot in the cockpit is an asset (an extra set of eyes who can spot safety concerns). That's why we have 4 guys up front for takeoff and landing during long hauls. Anyone else is a liability or safety hazard in the cockpit. Can you understand the ATC radio transmissions enough to stop talking if you hear a call midway through your life's story? Would you be able to pickup a missed radio call and have the confidence to say "that was for us!" I didn't think so! Only pilots should be allowed in the cockpit. Most others just get in the way, or create unnecessary distractions. There is no cockpit door in the freighter, so the upper deck seats must be considered as being in the cockpit. Also, other than Cabin Crew, no one else takes the necessary yearly evacuation training.
Funny you brought this up. And what do we see in the granting of JS on pax aircraft
J1: wife/girlfriends/relatives
J2: other pilots
J3: cabin crew
J4: ground staff
J5: ground staff family

If we are talking about safety and being an asset, the JS priority be the following:
J1:other pilots/ground engineers (no one knows more about the plane's system than the LAME)
J2:ground staff (ramp/load control) / cabin crew
J3:other ground staff
J4:all others

I highly doubt that a pilot jump-seating on the freighter would being seating in the actual cockpit and help out the operating crew. I bet he/she would be sleeping in the bunk for most of the journey. Your argument doesn't hold water.

FYI: some ground staff are just as qualify as most pilots, if not more qualify, to perform the tasks you mentioned. Some are former CAD/FAA/JAA inspectors. Some have advanced PhD's in aerospace engineering - having a hand in designing the plane you fly in. Some are former pilots with other airlines. Just don't look down on all ground staff as if they are all pencil-pushers and ramp-rats. Some have more education and expertise than some pilots.
minglestar is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2010, 09:18
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Crew bunk
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Funny you brought this up. And what do we see in the granting of JS on pax aircraft
J1: wife/girlfriends/relatives
J2: other pilots
J3: cabin crew
J4: ground staff
J5: ground staff family
I didn't say that I agreed with that one, either. Most other airlines don't allow you to bring your parents/girlfriends/etc into the cockpit in flight. Why do we? I'm surprised that the FAA even allows that on flights into the US. BTW, on a pax aircraft, we have Cabin Crew to help get your sorry ass out of the plane. On the freighter we don't. You're just another liability for us.

J6: Minge-star
Now that one cracked me up! LOL! Obviously, not seriously pertaining to what were trying to discuss, but I think I did pee my pants a little bit!

FYI: some ground staff are just as qualify as most pilots, if not more qualify, to perform the tasks you mentioned. Some are former CAD/FAA/JAA inspectors. Some have advanced PhD's in aerospace engineering - having a hand in designing the plane you fly in. Some are former pilots with other airlines. Just don't look down on all ground staff as if they are all pencil-pushers and ramp-rats. Some have more education and expertise than some pilots.
That statement just clarified who I'm trying to reason with. What in the heck does an "advanced?" PHD's in anything have to do with anything? All the education in the world doesn't mean crap unless you have current training in the task at hand. That means yearly evacutation/fire-fighting training, and knowledge of what is supposed to be happening in the flightdeck. I'd love for everyone (including Dingle-Berry) to meet these requirements, but unless you're a pilot, I'd hazard a guess that you don't (which is why your so miffed about pilots getting something that you don't, and not about why the company won't allow it when other companies do.)
Pogie is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2010, 22:13
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Get real. ANC ground staff use the freighter jump seats all the time.
Obama57 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.