Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Flying Instructors & Examiners
Reload this Page >

Training - does the 12 year engine limit still apply?

Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

Training - does the 12 year engine limit still apply?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Oct 2017, 10:38
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: England
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Training - does the 12 year engine limit still apply?

I remember hearing/reading that EASA had a restriction on training with engines that were more than 12 years old, regardless of TBO hours. Now I am told that this is no longer the case, it is the responsibility of the ATO to be satisfied that the aircraft is "suitable". No-one can tell me where this is written.

Any comments, pointers to the appropriate document?
pumpkinpilot is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2017, 12:03
  #2 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: England
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here is the answer, which I believe to be correct. For airworthiness purposes, training is considered to be commercial, therefore no relaxation on the 12 year life, or TBO.
This could/should change when Part M light comes into effect.

End of topic?
pumpkinpilot is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2017, 06:19
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Down at the sharp pointy end, where all the weather is made.
Age: 74
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
...except when the aircraft is owned by the person receiving the training, so no, the debate continues!

Also, the 12 year and TBO are both subject to 2 x 10% extensions, on condition.

TOO
TheOddOne is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2017, 20:15
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: France
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The discussion would be shorter if references to the actual pieces of legislation were given.
172510 is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2017, 10:45
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: UK North
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes I have been looking for this also and cannot find anything! Is it just a rumour??
Bridgestone17 is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2017, 18:42
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Uxbridge
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
At the moment the rule still applies, but you won't find any recent reference to it, many have tried to find such a reference. There was a short period a number of months ago where the rule was thought to have gone away, as apparently confirmed by a CAA surveyor, but that verbal statement was later rescinded.
MrAverage is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2017, 09:44
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
At the moment the rule still applies, but you won't find any recent reference to it
Yes, you will - CAP747 Mandatory Requirements for Airworthiness, Section 2, Part 3, GR No.24
BillieBob is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2017, 09:47
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,581
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From the EASA Website:
What are the plans of EASA in regards of the guidance relating to components’ Time between overhaul (TBO) extension?

The Decision 2013/025/R of the Executive Director of the Agency of 11 September 2013 "Recommended practice for TBO extension’"was published by EASA in September 2013. Two months later, in December 2013, the ED Decision 2013/034/R cancelled the ED Decision 2013/025/R - "Recommended practice for TBO extension". That was done in reply to implementation difficulties reported by some NAAs. Afterwards EASA has decided to include the guidance related to the extension of the TBO into the framework of the Rulemaking task Part-M GA Task Force (Phase II).
Whopity is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2017, 12:30
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: UK North
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks BillieBob and Whopity......
Bridgestone17 is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2017, 13:57
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Uxbridge
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks BillieBob, that revision passed me by somehow.
MrAverage is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.