Pro's and Con's for a T-Tail
 

Hi,
I am trying to find out what the advantages and disadvantages are of having a T-tail like on the Embraer 145?

So far i've found: -

Disadvantages to be: -

• The possibility of a deep stall
• The vertical stablizer must be made stronger and stiffer to support the forces generated by the tailplane

Advantages to be: -

• The elevator and stabilizer are out the way of FOD being kicked up the the tires, engines etc etc.
• Allows high performance aerodynamics and excellent glide ratio as the empennage is not effected by the wing slip steam.

My question is 1) are these correct and 2) are there any more??

A T-tail does not cause deep stall, although it may well aggravate it when it happens.

The deep stall is caused by tip stall on a swept wing, which causes the lift centre to move inboard and forward.

At least incomplete LM, in theory a deep stall in a T tail light airplane is possible.
Ultimately it would depend on CoG and the momentum of the airplane

http://expertaviator.com/wp-content/...ailHighAOA.jpg
Source: FAA Flying handbook
http://www.free-online-private-pilot...deep_stall.gif

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi..._1-36_NASA.jpg

Let me google that for you

Another advantage is that the arm to the CG is longer so the elevator is more effective which means the manufacturer can make it smaller.
Smaller stabilizer and elevator means less drag.

My understanding of the deep stall was as the a/c is sinking the relative airflow now comes more from below the wing meaning you can have angles of attack of around 20 degrees with 0 degrees pitch angle. This is then exacerbated by the nose up moment from the centre of pressure moving forward.

The T-tail can make the deep stall impossible to recover from due to tail blanking, where the wash from the wing also disturbs airflow over the tailplane. This would make pitch inputs difficult/impossible.

Anyone please feel free to correct me if my understanding of this is incorrect.

Correct packo, but the aeroplane does not need a T-tail to get into deep stall.

No need for push-back (if engines is mounted at the back of course).

Oh dear- time to leave this thread.

DUH...I didn't make those pictures specifically for this thread you know.
I even mentioned the reference source.

- not necessarily those 'as illustrated' but some T-Tail a/c - ask the next-of-kin of Mike Lithgow? If you want a deep tech study (somewhat dated) T-Tail study

An advantage of a T-tail is that the endplate effect of the horizontal allows the vertical tail to be substantially (25% or so) smaller.

Another one is that the rudder is not blanked by the horizontal at very high angle of attack, making it more effective to get out of a spin.

A T-tail does not necessarily lead to deep stall tendencies, it depends on a number of factors such as wing loading, etc.

Your second listed advantage (wing slip stream) is questionable, I wouldn't list it as such.

--M

A t tail allows for placing engines on the rear end of the plane...this allows for more efficent design of the wing

it allows engines to be closer together and allows for a smaller rudder/vertical fin to compensate for engine out situations, thereby reducing drag.

however putting all that stuff on the tail makes the plane tail heavy and it must be carefully balanced up in the nose.

my favorite plane is the DC9...flys great...engines at the tail means they are slightly more protected and no one has been sucked into the engines on a DC9.


oh, and putting the engines in the tail means the whole plane is quieter.

Engines are higher off the ground, making them harder to service/maintain/remove. Uncontained failures can still sever hydraulic lines/control cables (in the tail).

If there are four engines on the tail, the engine pairs are very close to each other, increasing the risk of one affecting another.

Everyone (almost) here seems to have an opinion about a "deep stall"...

Lots of theory....all B.S. in the real world of commercial flight...

Get some experience you "puppies" and then hopefully you won't ever have to answer the "what happens in a deep stall?"

'Nuff said...

Additional advantages:

Mounting the tailplane high puts it in an area of low downwash gradient making the tailplane a more effective stabiliser and a more aft cg is possible. This also leads to the tail generally having a more positive loading and thereby reducing trim drag

The T-tail raises the tailplane out of the fuselage drag-hole which can reduce your tailplane effective aspect ratio by 20% or more.

Disadvantages:

Very messy loading and structural design.
Tailplane more difficult to clear snow off and access for maintenance and checking.
Tilting of the principle axes of inertia giving rise to coupling issues in roll.

Absolutely correct. B2N2, I don't find the definition above incomplete.
I agree that that FAA figures give a different perspective, but in my opinion they are depicting a slight different scenario, where the wing is NOT actually stalled even if close to. By design, in the real stall (with weight and balance within certified limits of course) the nose should drop forward so giving better authority to the elevators while in the real deep stall that doesn't happen, because the CG keeps moving forward to a point that the recovery is virtually impossible. Anyway, imho, i think that the same term "deep stall" is used to define 2 different situations.


FB

When it comes to military transport aircraft a T tail means you dont have to spend time worrying about parachute static lines fouling the elevator (as you have to for the Hercules).
Also I had to smile when I saw the size of the tailplane design grow on the A400M after we had supplied Airbus with data on the cg transients of a heavy drop.

Most medium to high wing loading T-tail airplanes will do this only with the help of a stick pusher and/or ventral fins, an additional complexity to take into account when selecting a T-tail. This pitching moment sign reversal with fully deflected elevator normally takes place in the post stall regime though, that's why it is also called deep stall.

Exactly.

--M

One advantage in a glider (sailplane) of having a T tail is that when doing an out-field landing it helps keep the elevators and horizontal stabilisor out of a tall standing crop.:(

It also looks pretty!

MB

T tail advantage: If the aircraft is a flying boat, it keeps the tail out of the water.

Disadvantages: Much more difficult to inspect for frost/snow/ice, and clean if required.
More complex elevator and trim control systems, and,
Depending upon aircraft type and configuration, a high tail might be out of the prop wash, which reduces pitch control on the ground (less able for soft field takeoffs).

Generally yes, though more vulnerable to snow and ice from the top of the fuselage being ingested.

When you present your thesis, don't forget to remove those silly apostrophes.