617 Squadron - After The Dams
Thread Starter
617 Squadron - After The Dams
If you are at a loose end this Bank Holiday Monday -
"What The Dambusters Did Next" - CH5 2100
What the Dambusters did next: The missions that changed the course of WWII | World | News | Daily Express
"What The Dambusters Did Next" - CH5 2100
What the Dambusters did next: The missions that changed the course of WWII | World | News | Daily Express
Depending on what you read and if you care to believe it, 617 should probably have been disbanded when Gibson left. Holden wasn't liked, Martin was thought lacking in administrative experience when given temporary command. Appalling losses and poor operations added to hit moral. You would have thought that after the dams losses, the use of heavy bombers on low level targets would have been abandoned. Like many aspects of the bomber war however Bomber Command ploughed on regardless and many more brave men paid the ultimate price.
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Colchester
Age: 40
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
617 Squadron - After The Dams
Rolling20, I would point you towards the fact that IX and 617 did bag the Tirpitz...and they could do precision better than the Pathfinders.
Dash, I think you are missing the point old boy. Tirpitz was sunk in September 44 and by 9 Squadron according to legend. There were a lot of misses and losses before then. 8 Group was never used for precision targets. This became a bone of contention later in the war between Bennett and Cochrane.
617
All the night bombing should have stopped ,to many losses.The RAF would have been better off building more twin eng types like the Mosquito and sending daylight low levels with much more precision and therefore good usage of resources.
Just my opinion of course!
Just my opinion of course!
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Colchester
Age: 40
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
617 Squadron - After The Dams
All for the Mossie! Same bomb load as the B-17 with the same range and 8 less crew, 2 less engines, and performance to beat most fighters of its day once the bombs are gone! But it couldn't carry a Tallboy ;-)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cloud 9
Posts: 2,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All for the Mossie! Same bomb load as the B-17 with the same range and 8 less crew, 2 less engines, and performance to beat most fighters of its day once the bombs are gone! But it couldn't carry a Tallboy ;-)
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: UK
Age: 68
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I watched it on C5 last night. Very interesting programme.
Leonard Cheshire gave a lecture at my school when I was 8-12 years old and I have learned more about him since, but I was still mightily impressed by details of his missions.
Leonard Cheshire gave a lecture at my school when I was 8-12 years old and I have learned more about him since, but I was still mightily impressed by details of his missions.
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Fife
Age: 75
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Having served for 39 years - 3 of them in the Vulcan days at Scampton- I often cringe when some of these types of programmes come on the TV - especially some about 617 - but I have to say I thoroughly enjoyed the programme John - Well done Sir !!