Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

YMML queue rwy 16 yesterday

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Dec 2023, 21:36
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Land of Oz
Posts: 306
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
In all fairness, I think ML is ‘usually’ the quickest at departures. I routinely get a clearance to line up and depart with traffic at 3 miles. SY comes second with about 3-5 miles and BN the worst with a mighty dash at 5-7 miles and we sit there for another 3 minutes waiting……and waiting…..and waaaaaiiting for it to arrive………..
No Idea Either is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 2nd Dec 2023, 21:45
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,789
Received 415 Likes on 229 Posts
Originally Posted by No Idea Either
In all fairness, I think ML is ‘usually’ the quickest at departures. I routinely get a clearance to line up and depart with traffic at 3 miles. SY comes second with about 3-5 miles and BN the worst with a mighty dash at 5-7 miles and we sit there for another 3 minutes waiting……and waiting…..and waaaaaiiting for it to arrive………..
Don't beleive everything you are told, Melbourne say traffic within x miles, when it's actually further out, rarely is the separation less than 4-5 miles between arrivals.
43Inches is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2023, 07:07
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What is the staffing like in the tower? Are they short like seemingly everywhere else or is it normally fully staffed?
hmmmitsjustme is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 3rd Dec 2023, 22:04
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: North Haven
Posts: 214
Received 165 Likes on 78 Posts
Nothing has improved during his reign and yet the government keeps renewing his contract.
The bloke is an imbecile, surrounded by yes men and women. That airline management are doing nothing about him, i.e. insisting on some sort of performance criteria is baffling. I would suggest that they're staying quiet should their own 'performance' be brought under the microscope.

United Airlines are saying they've had their best ever year, now that is saying something. Aircraft orders and deliveries are staggering, recruitment is hammering. Yet good ole Australia will sit around, making hammering staff on conditions a priority, rather parking jets than getting them in the air making money.

Just take a look at United's flights out of Australia and tell me who our national airline is.

If you don't see how much of a joke this country's airline/aviation industry is then you're a bit dim.
Mr Mossberg is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2023, 22:57
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 1,173
Received 201 Likes on 99 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr Mossberg
...
Just take a look at United's flights out of Australia and tell me who our national airline is.
​​​​​​...
For August, there were around 410 return flights between Australia and the US - United operated 113 (27.6 percent) of those with an average LF of 75.4 percent; the QF group operated 213 (52.0 percent) with an average LF of 82.0 percent.

In terms of pax, again for August, there were in aggregate something like 134,059 pax moved between the two countries - United carried 47,218 (35.2 percent); the QF group carried 89,013 (66.4 percent).
MickG0105 is online now  
Old 3rd Dec 2023, 23:50
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 310
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
They had the foresight to build terminal four with a lot of shopping and parking. Best shopping and parking ever. Who needs a runway or railway.
RickNRoll is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2023, 06:59
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Land of Oz
Posts: 306
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by 43Inches
Don't beleive everything you are told, Melbourne say traffic within x miles, when it's actually further out, rarely is the separation less than 4-5 miles between arrivals.
TCAS is pretty close and visually I think I can tell what’s about 3 miles and what’s 5 after thirty years. And quite routinely I’m about 1000’ when a ‘TO’ clearance is issued to someone on the ground. But in any case, I think there is room for improvement everywhere. I watched a company aircraft piss around when told ‘line up be ready immediately’ and cause a go round a few years ago. A controller will only be burnt that way once………..
No Idea Either is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2023, 07:36
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Dunnunda
Posts: 252
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by No Idea Either
TCAS is pretty close and visually I think I can tell what’s about 3 miles and what’s 5 after thirty years. And quite routinely I’m about 1000’ when a ‘TO’ clearance is issued to someone on the ground. But in any case, I think there is room for improvement everywhere. I watched a company aircraft piss around when told ‘line up be ready immediately’ and cause a go round a few years ago. A controller will only be burnt that way once………..
Spot on! The mini backtrack on 16/34 is also back from a few select players…. That really helps the next aircraft.
GA Driver is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2023, 08:51
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Australia/India
Posts: 5,287
Received 419 Likes on 209 Posts
A frequent contributor to this topic over many, many years has said that the primary cause of the problem is: lack of concrete. That's short hand for not enough runway, not enough aircraft gates and not enough aircraft parking area. The gist of their point is that no amount of air traffic control can cure a lack of concrete.
Lead Balloon is online now  
Old 4th Dec 2023, 09:33
  #70 (permalink)  
Gne
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: With the Wizard
Posts: 189
Received 55 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by Lead Balloon
A frequent contributor to this topic over many, many years has said that the primary cause of the problem is: lack of concrete. That's short hand for not enough runway, not enough aircraft gates and not enough aircraft parking area. The gist of their point is that no amount of air traffic control can cure a lack of concrete.
You can build as many runways as you like but, at the end of the day an airport's "capacity" will be determined by the ability of the surrounding airspace (and those who "manage" it ) to deliver aircraft to those runways and accept aircraft departing from them. And that other stuff LB mentioned.

Gne

Last edited by Gne; 5th Dec 2023 at 01:32.
Gne is offline  
The following 3 users liked this post by Gne:
Old 4th Dec 2023, 20:07
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Australia/India
Posts: 5,287
Received 419 Likes on 209 Posts
Just put all the extra concrete in G - like Ballina - and job done!
Lead Balloon is online now  
The following users liked this post:
Old 4th Dec 2023, 22:00
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: S33E151
Posts: 1,086
Received 59 Likes on 29 Posts
Feel for anyone stuck in that.
Someone mentioned JFK taxi times. AFAIK the record is still 8 hours taxi time. JFK-LAX taxi out with two crew, hit TOD limits before they made the runway, so it was time to return to the gate but then they were at the back of the return queue. That's quite a bit of taxi practice
V-Jet is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2023, 22:40
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,789
Received 415 Likes on 229 Posts
Originally Posted by V-Jet
Feel for anyone stuck in that.
Someone mentioned JFK taxi times. AFAIK the record is still 8 hours taxi time. JFK-LAX taxi out with two crew, hit TOD limits before they made the runway, so it was time to return to the gate but then they were at the back of the return queue. That's quite a bit of taxi practice
JFK has real amounts of traffic and very bad weather including snow and ground deice requirements at times. As well as destination ports all around that suffer the same issues. Melbourne has some wind, rare fog and the odd mild thunderstorm. Most of the times you get excessive holding weather barely plays any part. Airspace wise, apart from the Essendon quadrant there is pretty much 300 degrees of open, unrestricted airspace for 100s of miles.

As said above above lack of runways, and poor airspace design and management is the problem. Theres also a distinct lack of coordination between ground, tower and departures, that leads to either no gaps for departures, or excessive gaps when no or few departures.

If you want a basic idea of lack of coordination, take LAHSO on 34. Then put all the domestic arrivals and departures on 27 and hold departures when the domestic arrivals could all be holding short while departures are unrestricted on 27. Why have most arrivals on 27 when LAHSO is in progress???

Last edited by 43Inches; 5th Dec 2023 at 01:26.
43Inches is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2023, 01:52
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The world's most liveable city
Posts: 245
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by deja vu
You tow aircraft that are ready for push back from the gate to a remote stand where later push back will not be required, leave one guy on the headset until ATC give a start clearance 10-15 mins before departure.
They did this effectively at Pudong , Beijing, Chen Lap Kok and even Kai Tak over 20 years ago.
And where do you suggest we do that at Melbourne?
RAC/OPS is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2023, 01:57
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The world's most liveable city
Posts: 245
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by VHOED191006
Why can't they use runway 27? The crosswind component would only be 15-20 knots?
it was a south easterly - too much tailwind on 27. We’re constrained by the no more than 5kt on a dry runway, any at all on a wet runway….maybe the airlines should push for this to be changed. We are all for it!
RAC/OPS is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2023, 02:06
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The world's most liveable city
Posts: 245
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by No Idea Either
TCAS is pretty close and visually I think I can tell what’s about 3 miles and what’s 5 after thirty years. And quite routinely I’m about 1000’ when a ‘TO’ clearance is issued to someone on the ground. But in any case, I think there is room for improvement everywhere. I watched a company aircraft piss around when told ‘line up be ready immediately’ and cause a go round a few years ago. A controller will only be burnt that way once………..
if anything we might tell you the traffic is closer than it is to get you (not you personally) to hurry up. There is such a large variation of how quickly or not different airlines (even individual pilots) line up and get going. We have to work with the lowest common denominator.
RAC/OPS is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2023, 02:35
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Somewhere on the Australian Coast
Posts: 1,091
Received 164 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally Posted by RAC/OPS
if anything we might tell you the traffic is closer than it is to get you (not you personally) to hurry up. There is such a large variation of how quickly or not different airlines (even individual pilots) line up and get going. We have to work with the lowest common denominator.
Any pilot who can read their TCAS and knows that 3 degrees is 320’/Nm isn’t going to be suckered into thinking that the little white icon at +13 is 3 miles out. 😁
DirectAnywhere is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2023, 02:55
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The world's most liveable city
Posts: 245
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by DirectAnywhere
Any pilot who can read their TCAS and knows that 3 degrees is 320’/Nm isn’t going to be suckered into thinking that the little white icon at +13 is 3 miles out. 😁
so why has someone suggested that the traffic is further out? How does that help ATC?
RAC/OPS is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2023, 02:59
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Somewhere on the Australian Coast
Posts: 1,091
Received 164 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally Posted by RAC/OPS
so why has someone suggested that the traffic is further out? How does that help ATC?
Not sure what you mean sorry. Just saying there’s no point you telling me traffic is at 3 miles to get me to hurry up when I can see from its profile on TCAS that it’s further out. 🤷‍♂️
DirectAnywhere is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2023, 03:04
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The world's most liveable city
Posts: 245
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by DirectAnywhere
Not sure what you mean sorry. Just saying there’s no point you telling me traffic is at 3 miles to get me to hurry up when I can see from its profile on TCAS that it’s further out. 🤷‍♂️
I’m not saying we’d say 3 when it’s 5 - more like 2.5 when it’s 3. On another point raised here we will word number one for an immediate departure hoping to get the second one away in the same gap. Doesn’t often happen. I know “immediate” means line up and take off without stopping but it seems some guys just like to admire the view.
RAC/OPS is offline  
The following users liked this post:


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.