Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Sen X, YMML Runways, and now YBBN?

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Sen X, YMML Runways, and now YBBN?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Nov 2014, 22:12
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Bavaria
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sen X, YMML Runways, and now YBBN?

Senate Estimates Transport/Regional Services Transcript should be interesting when it comes out next week.

Melbourne Airport Risk - Airservices

Apparently Airservices are just about to recommence a simultaneous runway procedure at Brisbane, after some political pushing.

Sen X is perhaps going to be busy once again?
the.new.black is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2014, 07:47
  #2 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Bavaria
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is a lot of mention in the AIP SUPS for the new routes, Stars and Sids in to BN that the changes are due to the BN Dependent Runway Operations Concept of Operations - but I can not find any link to that anywhere? i.e. The Concept of Operations.

The only thing I have found is this mention in the ERSA:

http://www.airservicesaustralia.com/...3-Nov-2014.pdf

Extract:

2. DEPENDANT RUNWAY OPERATIONS (DROPS)

2.1 Dependant converging approaches may take place in VMC to RWY combination 19/14. In the application of dependant RWY OPS, RWY nomination conditions specified in AIP ENR 1.1.4.5 (Nomination of RWY) apply. MAX downwind/crosswind and headwind criteria also apply as described BLW. Dependant Runway Operations are not applicable for general aviation VFR ACFT.

2.2 In the event that the dependency criteria are not met, the ACFT on RWY 19 will be removed FM the PROC.
ATC instructions to terminate the PROC will usually consist of a left turn and a climb to A030. Pilots should monitor ATC FREQ carefully and respond promptly to any instructions.

2.3 CONDITIONS
a. Pilots will be advised of their participation via CATIS or directed INFO by 10NM.
b. MAX crosswind/headwind RWY 19/14 - 20KT.
c. MAX downwind/RWY 19/14 - 5KT.
So is this related to LAHSO? And if so, how could it relate to the risk reports that have been mentioned in Senate Estimates?
the.new.black is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2014, 22:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: at the computer
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
During LAHSO or converging RWY ops, there is no sequencing between arrivals to ensure separation during a go around. With YBBN RWY 19/14 dependant operations, due to the proximity of the two RWYs sequencing instructions will be issued to ensure separation will exist in the event of a go around. Because of this, there will be little gain in arrival numbers but it should free up some departure slots on RWY 19.
1Charlie is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2014, 23:01
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YMML
Posts: 2,561
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Try to stay out of here....is this why there appears to be some obvious missed approaches in VMC off 27 in ML?

Just watched a Dugong go missed with no A/C lifting off northbound tracks. Peculiar to see...
OZBUSDRIVER is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2014, 01:42
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: deepest darkest recess of your mind
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not really, could be that they just f@cked up...
porch monkey is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.