Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

REX minimum requirements

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Oct 2014, 05:54
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oz
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are Rex serious? They want 2000 hours TT with 500 Multi under IFR. That's for an FO position! The only other operator that wants those sort of hours is Cobham. Anyone care to comment?
I remember chatting to Kendall 'Back in the day' and circa late 1990's you needed 5000 hours to be competitive for a FO positions.

Personally I think 2000 Total is probably a reasonable number and yes 5000 was ridiculous. (And realistically 2000 hours is only 4 years of experience if you fly full time and in a high hour job maybe 3.)

So yes Rex are serious and maybe some more attitude correction time in GA might be required
ga_trojan is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2014, 06:35
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Personally I think 2000 Total is probably a reasonable number and yes 5000 was ridiculous. (And realistically 2000 hours is only 4 years of experience if you fly full time and in a high hour job maybe 3.)
Oh yea only 4 years to then end up getting paid $46,000 while a 210 award is $40,000.

Is this also back in the day when there was bulk twins flying? You could probably count the number of companies who operate twin IFR Pistons these days on your two hands!
deadcut is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2014, 11:48
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Outside
Age: 51
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is REX or indeed any regionals hiring these days?


Where does one record IFR hours in the log book? I just fly, sometimes ifr sometimes vfr but never have I bothered to count hours flown under the ifr as opposed to hours in imc.
Seems an odd requirement to me. Surely common sense would indicate if an individual had 500 multi a fair whack of that would be under the ifr.


Having said that if they only pay 46k per year as stated above they would struggle to recruit anyone from a Titan or Chieftain etc when the going rate for these types seems to be around the 60k.
Ken Worth is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2014, 22:36
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not too sure where this $46000 figure is coming from... The actual figure for a first year FO is $54000 and after your second anniversary you earn almost $63000. That said, their EBA is almost done, so (assuming a 3%pa wage increase) it's likely that a direct entry new start from today would, after 2 years be earning close to $67000. If they were lucky enough to jag a command then that figure (after two years in the company) would be approx $99000. As I said... Where that $46000 figure comes from I don't know...
KoolKaptain is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2014, 05:27
  #25 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This still doesn't explain why REX's requirements are so high compared to QLink and Virgin. That's what I'm getting at.
pilotboy007 is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2014, 09:48
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,293
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
It is what it is! No point getting worked up about it!

You just have to go along with it and fit in when you can!
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2014, 10:58
  #27 (permalink)  
BPA
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The answer is on page 1. REX is low capacity RPT and must comply with CAO82.3 and therefore the minimum hour requirements as listed. Qlink and VARA are high capacity RPT and must comply with CAO 82.5 which doesn't list minium hour requirements.
BPA is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2014, 21:47
  #28 (permalink)  
Sprucegoose
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
This still doesn't explain why REX's requirements are so high compared to QLink and Virgin. That's what I'm getting at.
You're not listening, several people have already supplied the answer, it's all about time to command. Assuming you get a job at QLink or Virgin with the minimums, you will spend more time in the right seat before command.

Lesson one to being a good F/O is listening!
Howard Hughes is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2014, 09:45
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Wangaratta
Posts: 76
Received 16 Likes on 5 Posts
They really aren't that high. It's the minimum required by the CAO's for a command, which is what they will hire you for. However, without any similar multi crew turboprop time you will need some time in the RHS to get up to speed before swapping hands. Typically less than 12 months. As others have said, certainly no shortage of FO's with the cadets.

Vara you will need those sought of hours if you want a look in, possibly even some turboprop if you want to be competitive.

As for qlink, well a year 12 certificate will get you an interview. Have seen many pilots with only 500 total time let alone any multi time get a gig there.

Companies can stipulate whatever hours or requirements they want. If you don't meet them just keep chipping away until you do, then apply. Easy as that!!!
WillieTheWimp is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.