PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific-90/)
-   -   REX minimum requirements (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific/550039-rex-minimum-requirements.html)

pilotboy007 25th Oct 2014 21:59

REX minimum requirements
 
Are Rex serious? They want 2000 hours TT with 500 Multi under IFR. That's for an FO position! The only other operator that wants those sort of hours is Cobham. Anyone care to comment?

Boney 25th Oct 2014 22:54

I think these requirements are fair enough.

After all, they would want people that can move into the left hand a year after joining, if that was to ever occur. As we know, those sort of hr requirements are not a guarantee that it will be smooth but the odds are it will.

Saabs and aircraft of their type don't have Auto Throttles etc (from memory, Auto Pilot can not even be hooked up to VNAV). No ILS to ILS flying but dark night approaches with CTAF traffic etc and the Saab just loves icing up while you are at it. It can be very demanding work (although Regional Managements don't appreciate that fact one bit).

You young ones have been very spoilt over the last 10 years.

Go back to the late 90's when there were 10 drivers for every job.

Skytrans in Cairns had a fleet of Titans/Cessna 402's and Cessna 310's.

Up in the Torres Straits they had a couple of Britten Norman Islanders where you spent your first year living like an animal. In 1999 when I was sniffing around, the requirements for a taste of that glamourous life was.

2,500 TT
700 Multi Command.

However, when there is huge Airline growth for 2yrs every decade, all of a sudden, flying an aeroplane apparently becomes easy and requirements tumble.

smiling monkey 25th Oct 2014 23:24

Fair enough Boney, but why does Qlink and VARA have lower minimums despite flying similar type of ops and destinations?

Snakecharma 25th Oct 2014 23:50

The published numbers are minimums. Having a lower minimum doesn't guarantee that they will take anyone with that experience, it just gives the recruiters more options.

When you get a hiring boom many of the operators are all competing from the same talent pool, so the more experienced troops get soaked up quickly, if they set the minimums at the level they expect to hire at, then there is no room to move. If they set a lower minimum (but still at a point that they can manage from a training perspective) then they can look at the demographic of the new hires and perhaps mix them up so you have a combination of experienced and less experienced people, who will have different expectations in relation to command, type changes and base transfers etc (potentially will retire at different points as well).

Single pilot ifr ops are the hardest thing you will ever do. Regional flying isn't as hard in many ways, but harder in others - a much greater reliance on the crew, throwing bags, trim sheets, briefing/feeding/managing the punters, multiple sectors into uncontrolled ports/ctafs etc. lower pay than the airlines for harder (in my opinion) work.

In many ways I would funnel the more experienced people into the regional style operations and the less experienced ones into the jet, but that isn't what the prospective new hire wants, for valid and reasonable reasons.

If I could figure out a way of paying regional pilots more it would be good but unlikely given the way the market for pilots works.

Tee Emm 26th Oct 2014 00:12


They want 2000 hours TT with 500 Multi under IFR. That's for an FO position!

They want that experience because they know there is a huge oversupply of commercial pilots in Australia and it is a way of culling out the mob. Yet elsewhere you have 300 hour pilots flying as second in command on all sorts of overseas jet transports including the 777 and A330. From the sublime to the ridiculous.

Altimeters 26th Oct 2014 00:53

Another reason being is because Rex are operating under a low capacity AOC. Without the books nearby I can't remember the exact requirements but when operating in this low capacity the minimums are higher. The likes of Qlink and VARA flying bigger aircraft operate under a high capacity AOC (issued by the regulator), even though link have a couple of -200s left they are still operating under the same high capacity AOC.

I stand to be corrected though. :ok:

pineappledaz 26th Oct 2014 01:07

So why do Rex have a high direct entry hour requirement when they have a cadet $cheme?

triplefox 26th Oct 2014 01:18

I would suggest they have high direct entry requirements because they have a cadet scheme. As Boney said, they want guys who can move into the LHS relatively quickly, hence the 2000hr min requirement.

Capn Bloggs 26th Oct 2014 01:48


Originally Posted by Altimeters
Another reason being is because Rex are operating under a low capacity AOC. Without the books nearby I can't remember the exact requirements but when operating in this low capacity the minimums are higher.

Please explain?? Are you suggesting this "low AOC means higher requirements" is some CASA thing? Or are you suggesting that Rex is more out of control than Qlink and so it needs better pilots?? :confused:

drunk_pilot 26th Oct 2014 01:58

It's a command requirement for low capacity RPT. Refer CAO 82.3 Appendix 4:


Aeroplanes exceeding 5 700 kg MTOW

Air transport pilot (aeroplane) licence
Command (multi-engine aeroplane) instrument rating


2 000 hours total experience as a pilot, that includes:

500 hours as pilot in command (or acting as pilot in command under supervision) on multi-engine aeroplanes under the I.F.R.; and
50 hours as pilot in command (or acting as pilot in command under supervision) on the aeroplane type; and
100 hours experience as a pilot on night operations.

Capn Bloggs 26th Oct 2014 02:11

OK, thanks Drunk. I learn something every day. :ok:

HighFlyer55 26th Oct 2014 02:24

Rex are essentially employing direct entry soon-to-be captains, therefore they need to meet the CAO requirements.

Snake is correct, the guys I know in VARA and QLink all had well over the minimum requirements before they got a look in.

Capt Claret 26th Oct 2014 11:28


They want 2000 hours TT with 500 Multi under IFR. That's for an FO position! ...
Anyone care to comment?
If I recall correctly the minimum requirements when I got my first RPT job in about 1991, flying a Mohawk, were 2500 hrs, several IFR renewals, and I can't remember the command time requirement.

So, not too onerous I'd have thought.

Tee Emm 26th Oct 2014 12:25


500 hours as pilot in command (or acting as pilot in command under supervision) on multi-engine aeroplanes under the I.F.R.; and
50 hours as pilot in command (or acting as pilot in command under supervision) on the aeroplane type; and

I have suspected this for some time. ICUS is the new command time. After all, they are equal according to the highlighted text
Next we will hear is dual will be equivalent to ICUS (after all you are under supervision) :E

KRUSTY 34 26th Oct 2014 21:17

CASA watered down the requirements for the ATPL some years ago.

They reduced the Non ICUS component (actual command time) from 100 hours down to 70. As most integrated Cadet schemes produce only around 70 hours of real command experience, this eliminated one barrier to former Cadets attaining a Command. Particularly on Low-Cap Ops.

wheredidwhogo 27th Oct 2014 07:51

Probably a few experienced Nth QLD pilots maybe jumping ship soon to fill the seats of the new routes (REX) have picked up from Skytrans. Think you will find most if not all would qualify with those requirements?

Spinnerhead 28th Oct 2014 11:00

At last, a rational reply!

4forward8back 29th Oct 2014 00:30

Apparently REX also now require an Aerobatics Rating :E

https://flightaware.com/live/flight/...930Z/YWYY/YMML

(I'm sure it's just a Flightaware error. Happened during the severe storms in Melbourne Monday morning)

jsfboat 30th Oct 2014 18:40

Are they only hiring Australians? . I applied but never heard anything, have Beech 1900, Saab 340, and -145 time in the US. I heard they picked up a few pilots from Colgan, but not sure if it's true.

swh 31st Oct 2014 02:21

Do you have the right to live and work in Australia ?

Do you have a CASA licence ?


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:43.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.