PPRuNe Forums


ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11th Sep 2017, 11:28   #1 (permalink)
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: England
Posts: 953
Hectopascals

I've just noticed the word hectopascals being added to radio transmissions recently. Previously the controller would just say QHN 1011 and we all knew what he/she meant. This was all much tidier and led to shorter radio transmissions.

Is there a reason for this change, can we go back to the old way of not defining the units for pressure? Or using the word millibar which was less lumpy to say.
18greens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th Sep 2017, 11:43   #2 (permalink)

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 11,065
We've been having to read this back for quite some years now. We're all Europeans now.

(Except them 'Murricans, one of whom apparently didn't know that you're not supposed to set part of a European/metric setting on the inches subscale and subsequently frightened himself).

Some ATCOs are now totally unneccessary about it. How we managed in years gone by, no-one knows!
ShyTorque is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th Sep 2017, 12:10   #3 (permalink)
Gender Faculty Specialist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Stop being so stupid, it's my turn
Posts: 1,408
You are only required to add hectopascal if the pressure is below 1000.
Chesty Morgan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th Sep 2017, 12:10   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: An Airport Near You
Posts: 603
Usually just used when pressure is below 1000.
360BakTrak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th Sep 2017, 12:18   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: SE England
Posts: 502
"hectopascals" is a non-optional suffix for less than 1000 hPa, but I tend to add it for higher pressures if the accent or airline would suggest regular North American operations. Probably a bad habit.

Could we raise a petition to bring back millibars?
Dan Dare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th Sep 2017, 12:26   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NX
Age: 36
Posts: 20
It is a requirement to pass it when the pressure is below 1000 hpa. It is also a mandatory readback.

If it's any consolation, I can speak for the majority of atcos at my unit, we hate having to say it too. And more so when we insist it's readback. However, that's the rules. CAP413 refers.
Doody2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th Sep 2017, 12:34   #7 (permalink)
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: England
Posts: 953
So the Hpa thing is to stop the umbrellastands reading QNH 992 as 29.92 inches? I think i'm beginning to understand..Thanks!

And the rule about it only being read out when its less than 1000 would account for why I seldom hear it, only flying on beautiful high pressure days...

Yes lets bring back Mb.
18greens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th Sep 2017, 12:46   #8 (permalink)

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 11,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18greens View Post
So the Hpa thing is to stop the umbrellastands reading QNH 992 as 29.92 inches? I think i'm beginning to understand..Thanks!

And the rule about it only being read out when its less than 1000 would account for why I seldom hear it, only flying on beautiful high pressure days...

Yes lets bring back Mb.
Correct!
ShyTorque is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th Sep 2017, 12:53   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: River Thames & Surrey
Age: 69
Posts: 6,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18greens View Post
Yes lets bring back Mb.
I, and I think most other controllers/FISOs/pilots would agree, but unfortunately some ******** at ICAO thinks otherwise.
chevvron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th Sep 2017, 15:02   #10 (permalink)

 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 38
Posts: 4,186
Why on earth would we (re-)introduce new phraseology that would only be used in the UK? Are we looking to become even more non-standard than we are already?

I'm sure Russian ATC would love to have remained using metres as the unit of level, and US ATC to have remained using 'position and hold' rather than 'line up and wait'.

Is it really that bad? We should be looking at more standardisation across the world, not less.
Gonzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th Sep 2017, 18:07   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: jersey
Age: 68
Posts: 919
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gonzo View Post
Why on earth would we (re-)introduce new phraseology that would only be used in the UK? Are we looking to become even more non-standard than we are already?

I'm sure Russian ATC would love to have remained using metres as the unit of level, and US ATC to have remained using 'position and hold' rather than 'line up and wait'.

Is it really that bad? We should be looking at more standardisation across the world, not less.
I agree on the standardisation issue, Gonzo ; but weren't we standardised on millibars before the powers that be decided to replace that with hectopascals (which are exactly the same values as MBs !)
kcockayne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th Sep 2017, 18:27   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 191
I'd suggest that 99.9% of aircraft operatig over Europe and surrounds ARE NOT flying on the inches subscale and are using millabars/hectopastels day-in, day-out, year-in, year-out nay decade-in, decade-out. The 'confusion' thereby necessitating this needless waste of breath only exists in the minds of yet another ground-based 'safety' committee.
MaxReheat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th Sep 2017, 19:01   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 7,312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Dare View Post
Could we raise a petition to bring back millibars?
Could be one of the few positives to emerge from Brexit.
DaveReidUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th Sep 2017, 19:26   #14 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 1,817
It could be much worse.

Imagine if, instead of Pascal, the early pressure research had been carried out by by Boyle, or Gay Lussac.

Bring back Millibars and OKTAs. The Wx was much better and the summers were much warmer when we used those babies.
ZOOKER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th Sep 2017, 19:26   #15 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Texas
Posts: 300
Jest as an aside..

The ISO discourages the use of hecto, centi, deci etc.

After an excellent landing etc...
Flash2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th Sep 2017, 19:35   #16 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever someone will pay me to do fun stuff
Posts: 874
Quote:
The ISO discourages the use of hecto, centi, deci etc.
Mmmmm - QNH 101300 Pascal. Yup, so much easier.
LookingForAJob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th Sep 2017, 19:42   #17 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Texas
Posts: 300
How 'bout Kilo?
Flash2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th Sep 2017, 20:56   #18 (permalink)

 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 38
Posts: 4,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxReheat View Post
I'd suggest that 99.9% of aircraft operatig over Europe and surrounds ARE NOT flying on the inches subscale and are using millabars/hectopastels day-in, day-out, year-in, year-out nay decade-in, decade-out. The 'confusion' thereby necessitating this needless waste of breath only exists in the minds of yet another ground-based 'safety' committee.
Yes, let's ignore the level busts and near-level busts caused by N. American-based crews hearing 992(mb/hpa) and entering 29.92(in) (or similar), let alone the many every U.K. controller has caught at the readback stage.
Gonzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th Sep 2017, 21:52   #19 (permalink)
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: England
Posts: 953
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZOOKER View Post
It could be much worse.

Bring back Millibars and OKTAs. The Wx was much better and the summers were much warmer when we used those babies.
Ah I miss OKTAs. Better than Frank Sucks Big Ones. It will never leave me , nor any of my students. and yes the weather was better....

Last edited by 18greens; 11th Sep 2017 at 22:22.
18greens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th Sep 2017, 22:29   #20 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: behind the fruit
Posts: 219
It was introduced in 2011.
Was awkward for a couple of days and then business as usual.

Shows the adaptability to change of some in this profession
LEGAL TENDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:05.


1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1