Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Landing a/c minima sep

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Landing a/c minima sep

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Dec 2015, 13:58
  #21 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 428 Likes on 226 Posts
Sounds like the good old days when experience, common sense and a judicious application of the rules took precedence over the paper tigers who could only tell you it was the wrong decision when they had had a week to think about it!!
Totally agree. As another example, as a helicopter operator, I'm now made to to join the queue to use a runway I don't need or want to use and then be required to wait three minutes for vortex wake separation when it's obvious that with a twenty knot crosswind the vortex wake is gone over the airfield boundary and away in seconds.

Yet the rules allow me to hover taxy to the runway to line up and wait if I wanted to, or would have to do in a skidded aircraft. So I'm already airborne....
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 30th Dec 2015, 00:28
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,821
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
You won't get that at 'Woking International' especially if I'm on duty!!
chevvron is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2015, 00:34
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,821
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
Originally Posted by Helen49
Sounds like the good old days when experience, common sense and a judicious application of the rules took precedence over the paper tigers who could only tell you it was the wrong decision when they had had a week to think about it!!

[We also had more fun and less paperwork!!]
Les told me an even better one.
DC4 following a DC3; at POL the DC3 is 10 min ahead - separated.
At DCS, the DC4 is 7 min ahead and increasing - separated.
The 'D' man couldn't understand the request from the DC4 to overtake on the right!
(I think I know who you are Helen)
chevvron is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2016, 09:12
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Paradise
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I like the idea that ShannonACC submitted his inquiry on Pprune. Others can learn about the situation plus you get feedback from colleagues who are not sitting beside you.

Those who think their time is being wasted; go to another post, you don't have to read them all.
the Shue is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2016, 14:04
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ireland
Posts: 221
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I Have no issue with sharing knowledge.

I have concerns when someone makes reference to a specific occurrence.

The individual claims they are based in Shannon ACC.

They supposedly asked a "Dublin colleague" who was not able to give then an answer.

I found it strange that their next port of inquiry was to post online.

Not to ask any of their "colleagues" in BallyCasey seems strange not to mention pressing a button on the compad and asking one of their "colleagues" in Shannon Tower.

Unlike the UK Irish ATC transmissions are not protected under law and a number of sites frequently listen in and comment online regarding what they have heard/observed.

A particular site has a user with a similar username who's Bona Fides are suspect.
confused atco is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2016, 17:05
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by confused atco
I Have no issue with sharing knowledge.

I have concerns when someone makes reference to a specific occurrence.

The individual claims they are based in Shannon ACC.

They supposedly asked a "Dublin colleague" who was not able to give then an answer.

I found it strange that their next port of inquiry was to post online.

Not to ask any of their "colleagues" in BallyCasey seems strange not to mention pressing a button on the compad and asking one of their "colleagues" in Shannon Tower.

Unlike the UK Irish ATC transmissions are not protected under law and a number of sites frequently listen in and comment online regarding what they have heard/observed.

A particular site has a user with a similar username who's Bona Fides are suspect.
Pointless asking another unit - both the MATS and ICAO state the rules and equally state that there are exemptions to it - such as the ICAO one which says departing A/C is other end of runway, the get out on that is that if the runway is sufficiently long enough blah blah, equally maybe displaced threshold factors, and point at which departures line up from- so it will always be specific especially for capacity constrained multi use runways, and procedures will be approved within mats pt 2 or equivalent. As you can see already the 493 varies on ICAO guidance.

That aside worse thing an pilot can do is go around against a rolling aircraft, unless viewed time to stop the departure - you'll always end up closer to it than you would landing even if the other one still rolling down the runway with wheels firmly on ground - one of you is getting faster the other slower - going around means you get faster and already faster than the departure so will always result in being close and both of you are in a configuration that limits any form of wild acrobatics to avoid - my advice always land it unless ATC send you around(or you think ATC fell asleep)
3miles is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2016, 14:25
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote from 3miles

"That aside worse thing an pilot can do is go around against a rolling aircraft[/quote]

Not sure I agree;

The runway is very two
Dimensional, in that IF two aircraft are on it they are likely
To hit. The chances of aircraft hitting in the air is surely less, given the third dimension (height) and the ability to turn a few degrees?

Last edited by Bright-Ling; 20th Jan 2016 at 19:56. Reason: Misquoted
Bright-Ling is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.