Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

"Cleared Finals"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Feb 2012, 07:50
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Way down South
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Cleared Finals"

The other day in a radar environment, approaching the inbound, I was "cleared finals" for a NPA from the radar controller. I had not heard a clearance like this before, though I have had "cleared finals, maintain x000" meaning intercept the final approach track but maintain x000' until cleared for the approach from tower.

I interpolated this "cleared finals" to mean the same thing - intercept the final approach track but maintain the current altitude. I was rolled through to tower on reporting established on finals. On checking in with tower, making sure we said we were "cleared finals" as we were a bit iffy about the approach clearance, tower gave us the normal "continue, number 1". I asked for clarification as to whether we were cleared for the approach which then sparked confusion with the controller who obviously assumed we knew we were cleared for the approach.

After landing we talked with the ATC supervisor who stated that 'cleared finals' is standard terminolgy and means the same as 'cleared for the approach'.

Is this True? I can't find the 'cleared finals' term anywhere, and it's new to me, though this doesn't mean it isn't common or accepted practice of course.

Cheers
diggyduo is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2012, 08:58
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Never heard that phrase in a radar environment. Guess it must be a local thing.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2012, 10:13
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: AUS
Posts: 42
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Rather than joining Finals, I rather join Bases or Downwinds or Upwinds.

Or Final (Singular)
AmarokGTI is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2012, 06:35
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Way down South
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is there a 'go to' ICAO manual outlining what can be expected for approach clearances (like the equivalent of the 9613 for PBN)?

Last edited by diggyduo; 24th Feb 2012 at 06:53.
diggyduo is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2012, 08:08
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: 50+ north
Posts: 1,253
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Was it a civil ATCU in the UK? If it was the controller's phraseology is complete c**p. The Unit's Unit Training Plan and Unit Competency Scheme (if they operate one) are long overdue for review.

Both the controller and supervisor need to have a long look at MATS Part 1 and CAP 413 during their next break.

If its a UK MOD aerodrome, say no more! Why in this day and age cannot the MOD mandarins wake up, smell the coffee and use ICAO standard RTF phraseology, albeit supplemented with some of their own specific terms?

Was following a FAF aircraft into an MOD establishment, the pilote spoke very good (ICAO) english but was obviously uneasy with the verbosity of the controller that he was talking to.

Diggyduo

If its outside UK, ICAO Doc 4444, you will have to buy or (because its not cheap) find a friendly ATC Unit who may have one. If its in the UK CAP 493 and CAP 413, both freely available on the CAA website The UK Civil Aviation Authority
TCAS FAN is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2012, 08:50
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Way down South
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the input TCAS FAN.

It was in NZ, so the ICAO 4444 doc sounds like the reference.

Btw, this is no witch hunt. I'm just genuinely keen to resolve any ambiguities (especially in this phase of flight) that may be caused by local R/T procedures diverging from the published norm.
diggyduo is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2012, 08:52
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North West
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heathrow Director. I was always under the impression that there was no such thing as 'finals' just 'final'(in the singular). Is that correct?
mally35 is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2012, 09:18
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mally35... you are absolutely right.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2012, 13:12
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Tirana
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Below is what Doc 4444 says on Approach Phraseolygy





12.3.3.2 APPROACH INSTRUCTIONS

a) CLEARED (or PROCEED) VIA (designation);
b) CLEARED TO (clearance limit) VIA (designation);
c) CLEARED (or PROCEED) VIA (details of route to befollowed);
d) CLEARED (type of approach) APPROACH [RUNWAY (number)];
e) CLEARED (type of approach) RUNWAY (number)FOLLOWED BY CIRCLING TO RUNWAY (number);
f) CLEARED APPROACH [RUNWAY (number)];
g) COMMENCE APPROACH AT (time);
*h) REQUEST STRAIGHT-IN [(type of approach)] APPROACH [RUNWAY (number)];
i) CLEARED STRAIGHT-IN [(type of approach)] APPROACH [RUNWAY (number)];
j) REPORT VISUAL;
k) REPORT RUNWAY [LIGHTS] IN SIGHT;
… when a pilot requests a visual approach
*l) REQUEST VISUAL APPROACH;
m) CLEARED VISUAL APPROACH RUNWAY (number);
… to request if a pilot is able to accept a visual approach
n) ADVISE ABLE TO ACCEPT VISUAL APPROACH RUNWAY (number);
Note.—See 6.5.3 for provisions relating to visual approach procedures.
… in case of successive visual approaches when the pilot of a succeeding aircraft has reported
having the preceding aircraft in sight
o) CLEARED VISUAL APPROACH RUNWAY (number), MAINTAIN OWN SEPARATION FROM PRECEDING (aircraft type and wake turbulence category as appropriate)
[CAUTION WAKE TURBULENCE];
p) REPORT (significant point); [OUTBOUND, or INBOUND];
q) REPORT COMMENCING PROCEDURE TURN;
*r) REQUEST VMC DESCENT;
s) MAINTAIN OWN SEPARATION;
t) MAINTAIN VMC;
u) ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH (name) APPROACH PROCEDURE;
*v) REQUEST (type of approach) APPROACH [RUNWAY (number)];
*w) REQUEST (MLS/RNAV plain-language designator);
x) CLEARED (MLS/RNAV plain-language designator).
* Denotes pilot transmission.
Hope it helps



Cheers zilir
zilir is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.