John Gentleman, Manager, Aeronautical Charts & Data at the CAA has responded as follows:-
+++
Mike,
Thanks for this. The mistake re MEF is certainly ours and will be posted as an amendment on the VFR Chart Web site. We will note the comment on the obstacle near Reading. The problem is caused by there being no legislation in the UK requiring Local Authorities to notify when an obstacle is actually erected, they only have to announce when planning permission has been granted. Therefore when permission is given the obstacle is added to the UK obstacle database as a fail safe mechanism and we then have to rely on local knowledge to say whether or not it has been constructed and actually there!!
We all have an obligation to share flight safety information and I would really urge all pilots to inform us of charts errors as requested in the notes on the VFR chart i.e. at
[email protected]. and not expect us to monitor web sites such as pprune to glean information.(We, however, do read them as and when time allows!) Also even Chat forums can sometimes either be wrong or give misleading information and it is best to verify information before putting it out as fact,(a la Brize Norton frequency).
Well over 100 changes were made to the aeronautical information from Ed 28 on to Ed 29 of the Southern England and Wales Chart plus changes to the topo base made by OS. The aeronautical changes were list on the amendment page of the web site up until the new chart's effective date of 20 March. I trust that Evo had been amending his chart throughout the year and was really aware of the changes! The current changes on our web site refers to information that has changed since the production cut off date of 6 Feb and obviously refer to the Edition 29, these include the late and non AIRAC change of the Bourn frequency.
I have no objections if you wish to post my comments. My Staff are really here to help as much as we can and welcome comment at any time.
Regards,
John
+++
Whoops!
This e-mail arrived immediately after the one above.
+++
Mike,
To say the least I am furious and having to eat humble pie! - Brize Norton LARS frequency has indeed changed witness the NOTAM issued yesterday. It appears that the previous frequency was not assigned to Brize and was being used illegally. It had been in fact assigned to Scottish Mil and also to a unit in France and interference was being experienced by these other units and not Brize. Unfortunately nobody deemed to tell my Charts Editor of the pending change - in fact given the lead-in time required for publication it would have been too late in any case.
Apologies to the men who got their facts correct - it is a pity that the news came through the backdoor first but it does highlight the need to inform us via our chart correction facility at
[email protected] of any mistakes, changes etc on our charts that anybody knows about even if they are rumour and need substantiating.
Regards,
John
+++
All good and useful information IMHO. Please e-mail them with any other problems you spot.
Mike